Abstract:Cerebral angiography involves the antegrade injection of contrast media through a catheter into the vasculature to visualize the region of interest under X-ray imaging. Depending on the injection and blood flow parameters, the bolus of contrast can propagate in the upstream direction and proximal to the catheter tip, at which point contrast is said to have refluxed. In this in vitro study, we investigate the relationship of fundamental hemodynamic variables to this phenomenon. Contrast injections were carried … Show more
“…The power injector artifact is a larger issue that may need to be addressed by future evaluation of the injection technique and parameters. Antegrade contrast injections into the vasculature result in complex mixing phenomena at the catheter tip, and depending on the relative fluid momentums of contrast and blood, 4,5,7 injections can cause substantial hemodynamic disturbances 12 during the period of injection. Additionally, as stated above, when using a power injector, the inertia of the fluid in the large bore syringe causes contrast to emanate continually from the catheter tip, even after the injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the literature body is vast, functional angiography is not yet used routinely in patients because catheter-based contrast injections can cause complex and substantial hemodynamic disturbances in the vessel of interest. [4][5][6][7] However, the growth in neuro-endovascular treatment has rekindled interest in the use of angiographic techniques for flow assessment in various pathologies. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The treatment of aneurysms with flow diverters is particularly amenable to such analysis because (a) the reduction of intraaneurysmal flow remains a central hypothesis of treatment success; (b) flow diversion does not require (dense) intra-saccular device implantation, thus allowing for X-ray visualization of contrast transport within the aneurysm; and (c) instead of the need for extraction of absolute flow parameters, the change in intraaneurysmal contrast transport from pre-device implantation to post-device implantation can potentially be used to predict aneurysm occlusion.…”
Background The recent growth of neuro-endovascular treatment has rekindled interest in the use of angiographic techniques for flow assessment. Aneurysm treatment with flow diverters is particularly amenable to such analysis. We analyze contrast time–density curves — recorded within aneurysms before (pre) and immediately after (post) flow diverter implantation to estimate six-month treatment outcomes. Methods Fifty-six patients with 65 aneurysms were treated with flow diverters at two institutions. A region of interest was drawn around the aneurysm perimeter in image sequences taken both pre and post angiography, and the temporal variation in grayscale intensity within the aneurysm (time–density curve) was recorded. Eleven parameters were quantified from each time–density curve. Aneurysm occlusion status was recorded six months post treatment. The change in parameters from pre to post treatment was statistically evaluated between aneurysm occluded and non-occluded groups. Results Of the 11 parameters, eight were significantly different before and immediately after flow diversion. Considering the entire data set, none of the parameters was statistically different between the occluded and non-occluded groups. However, subgroup analyses showed that four variables were significantly different between the aneurysm occluded and non-occluded groups. The sensitivity of these variables to predict aneurysm occlusion at six months ranged from 60% to 89%, while the specificity ranged from 55% to 70%. Conclusions Device-induced intra-aneurysmal flow alterations quantified by simple aneurysmal time–density curves can potentially be used to predict long-term outcomes of flow diversion. Large multi-center studies will be required to confirm these findings. Patient-to-patient variability in coagulation may need to be incorporated for clinically relevant predictive values.
“…The power injector artifact is a larger issue that may need to be addressed by future evaluation of the injection technique and parameters. Antegrade contrast injections into the vasculature result in complex mixing phenomena at the catheter tip, and depending on the relative fluid momentums of contrast and blood, 4,5,7 injections can cause substantial hemodynamic disturbances 12 during the period of injection. Additionally, as stated above, when using a power injector, the inertia of the fluid in the large bore syringe causes contrast to emanate continually from the catheter tip, even after the injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the literature body is vast, functional angiography is not yet used routinely in patients because catheter-based contrast injections can cause complex and substantial hemodynamic disturbances in the vessel of interest. [4][5][6][7] However, the growth in neuro-endovascular treatment has rekindled interest in the use of angiographic techniques for flow assessment in various pathologies. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The treatment of aneurysms with flow diverters is particularly amenable to such analysis because (a) the reduction of intraaneurysmal flow remains a central hypothesis of treatment success; (b) flow diversion does not require (dense) intra-saccular device implantation, thus allowing for X-ray visualization of contrast transport within the aneurysm; and (c) instead of the need for extraction of absolute flow parameters, the change in intraaneurysmal contrast transport from pre-device implantation to post-device implantation can potentially be used to predict aneurysm occlusion.…”
Background The recent growth of neuro-endovascular treatment has rekindled interest in the use of angiographic techniques for flow assessment. Aneurysm treatment with flow diverters is particularly amenable to such analysis. We analyze contrast time–density curves — recorded within aneurysms before (pre) and immediately after (post) flow diverter implantation to estimate six-month treatment outcomes. Methods Fifty-six patients with 65 aneurysms were treated with flow diverters at two institutions. A region of interest was drawn around the aneurysm perimeter in image sequences taken both pre and post angiography, and the temporal variation in grayscale intensity within the aneurysm (time–density curve) was recorded. Eleven parameters were quantified from each time–density curve. Aneurysm occlusion status was recorded six months post treatment. The change in parameters from pre to post treatment was statistically evaluated between aneurysm occluded and non-occluded groups. Results Of the 11 parameters, eight were significantly different before and immediately after flow diversion. Considering the entire data set, none of the parameters was statistically different between the occluded and non-occluded groups. However, subgroup analyses showed that four variables were significantly different between the aneurysm occluded and non-occluded groups. The sensitivity of these variables to predict aneurysm occlusion at six months ranged from 60% to 89%, while the specificity ranged from 55% to 70%. Conclusions Device-induced intra-aneurysmal flow alterations quantified by simple aneurysmal time–density curves can potentially be used to predict long-term outcomes of flow diversion. Large multi-center studies will be required to confirm these findings. Patient-to-patient variability in coagulation may need to be incorporated for clinically relevant predictive values.
“…Introduction During angiography, the contrast bolus injected into a vessel can cause substantial changes in baseline pressures and flows. 1 There have been sparse case reports about aneurysmal re-bleeds during angiography. 2 A physician survey of injection rates used during angiography showed that 81% of respondents considered the impact of injection rate on aneurysm rupture to be negligible .…”
outcome, occlusion rate and reoperation. Moreover, clipping and stent-assisted coiling all showed higher occlusion rates compared with coiling alone. Conclusion Definitely, EVT is the mainstream treatment for paraclinoid aneurysms. Surgical clipping showed a higher complication risk than EVT. Clipping might be considered to be an alternative option for paraclinoid aneurysms if EVT are for hard hurdle because many complications were temporary, and occlusion tendency of clipping was also good. Disclosures S. Chung: None. S. Chang: None.
“…Introduction Several methods of extracting arterial blood flow rates from angiography have been attempted over the past decades. 1 2 However, catheter-based contrast injections in arteries can cause substantial disturbances to the baseline blood flow, 3 which has limited the utilization of these methods in the clinical setting. Contrast reflux, which is the movement of contrast proximal to the catheter tip is frequently observed during antegrade angiography.…”
reflected inverse correlation between thrombus-T2* relaxation time and red blood cell content (figures A to E). Conclusion FSE T2 WI and quantitative T2* mapping MR can help in characterization of emboli in large vessel occlusion patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.