2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10609-018-9347-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressing for Sentence? An Examination of the New Zealand Crown Prosecutor’s Role in Sentencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An amendment was sought from the Victoria University of Wellington Human Ethics Committee and subsequently approved. Although the interview could not be conducted face-to-face as originally planned, the use of audio-visual links is not unprecedented with this type of participant (see Britton, 2018), nor is it without potential advantages (e.g. Mealer & Jones, 2014;Novick, 2008;Sturges & Hanrahan, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An amendment was sought from the Victoria University of Wellington Human Ethics Committee and subsequently approved. Although the interview could not be conducted face-to-face as originally planned, the use of audio-visual links is not unprecedented with this type of participant (see Britton, 2018), nor is it without potential advantages (e.g. Mealer & Jones, 2014;Novick, 2008;Sturges & Hanrahan, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five individual Crown Solicitors across New Zealand were contacted, consisting of two "urban" and three "provincial" firms (as defined by Britton, 2018). Positive responses were received from four Crown Solicitors.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviews were initially planned to be conducted face-to-face or via telephone; however, this was changed to audio-visual link due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the interviews could not be conducted face-to-face, the use of audio-visual links for interviews is not unprecedented with this participant group (see Britton, 2018 ) and has several advantages including increased privacy and anonymity for small participant groups, and flexibility in terms of interview times and locations ( Sturges and Hanrahan, 2004 ; Holt, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosecutors are legal practitioners who prosecute an individual accused of a criminal offence (i.e., defendant) on behalf of the Crown, Police, and community. A CP in NZ is a Crown Solicitor, or private legal practitioner employed at a Crown Law firm, who is appointed by the Attorney General to assume responsibility for Crown Prosecutions on behalf of the Crown (Britton, 2018). There are currently 17 Crown Law firms situated across NZ who assume responsibility for Crown Prosecutions within their relevant regions.…”
Section: Nz Adversarial System and The Role Of Crown Prosecutorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosecutors do not advocate for the victim in the same way that defence lawyers advocate on behalf of their accused client, in which the defence typically prioritizes the accused client's best interests. Instead, the prosecution is responsible for impartially presenting the FEMALE CROWN PROSECUTORS' EXPERIENCES OF WORKING WITH SEXUAL TRAUMA 15 case on behalf of the Crown, Police and community and advocating for the interests of those entities, rather than the sole interests of the victim (Britton, 2018).…”
Section: Nz Adversarial System and The Role Of Crown Prosecutorsmentioning
confidence: 99%