2020
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00471-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Press Disturbance Alters Community Structure and Assembly Mechanisms of Bacterial Taxa and Functional Genes in Mesocosm-Scale Bioreactors

Abstract: Press disturbances are of interest in microbial ecology, as they can drive microbial communities to alternative stable states. However, the effect of press disturbances in community assembly mechanisms, particularly with regard to taxa and functional genes at different levels of abundance (i.e., common and rare), remains largely unknown. Here, we tested the effect of a continuous alteration in substrate feeding scheme on the structure, function, and assembly of bacterial communities. Two sets of replicate 5-li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in microbiome structure do not always translate to change in community function, possibly due to functional redundancy among taxa. In addition, functional recovery may proceed at a different rate from taxonomic recovery [ 69 ]. Furthermore, disturbance to the microbial community does not necessarily translate to a detriment for the host: change to the microbiota following disease may erode function, but alternatively may indicate selective change toward a microbial community that is more resistant to Bd invasion (i.e., community adaptation to Bd).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in microbiome structure do not always translate to change in community function, possibly due to functional redundancy among taxa. In addition, functional recovery may proceed at a different rate from taxonomic recovery [ 69 ]. Furthermore, disturbance to the microbial community does not necessarily translate to a detriment for the host: change to the microbiota following disease may erode function, but alternatively may indicate selective change toward a microbial community that is more resistant to Bd invasion (i.e., community adaptation to Bd).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, microbial seed-banks are thought to contribute to the maintenance of microbial diversity 47 and have been described as essential for understanding temporal community changes 48 . Further, stochastic assembly processes were shown to be more preponderant within the rare fraction of the microbial community 22 . Nonetheless, other processes might also be promoting stochastic assembly at intermediate disturbance frequencies, like ecological drift 36 and feedback mechanisms linked to density dependence and species interactions 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of community assembly processes underlying the observed patterns of diversity is reasonable, as such processes are believed to shape community structure 18 , which also links them to ecosystem function. These processes, either deterministic or stochastic, are known to act in combination to form community assembly [19][20][21][22] and can cause replicate communities to reach a similar or variable structure and function 17,23 . Further, while recent studies have reported positive correlations of strength of stochasticity with α-diversity in bacterial 24 and fungal 25 communities, the role of assembly processes behind diversity patterns under fluctuating disturbances is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of this work was on the stability of the nitrite oxidation function and the nitrifying microbial community, with overall community dynamics described in detail elsewhere 34 . Understanding community and activity dynamics of nitrifying bacteria is essential for improving design and operation of wastewater treatment biological processes 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%