2000
DOI: 10.1080/03637750009376501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presidential rhetoric's visual turn: Performance fragments and the politics of illusionism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite evidence to the contrary that later emerged, President Kennedy and his staff managed impressions of himself as a family man with family values by having photographs taken of him with his wife and his children (Lammers, 1982). Erickson (2000) also found that presidents used photos to influence, manipulate, entice, and amaze.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite evidence to the contrary that later emerged, President Kennedy and his staff managed impressions of himself as a family man with family values by having photographs taken of him with his wife and his children (Lammers, 1982). Erickson (2000) also found that presidents used photos to influence, manipulate, entice, and amaze.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presidential rhetoric's visual turn privileges dominant ideology (Erickson, 2000). One of the many devices, presidential travel, is used to gain favorable attention and popularity by many constituents (Darcy, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presidential performance fragments are embodied in photo opportunities and have been working for generations to inform a collective understanding of the leader of the free world (Erickson, 2000). This process has become increasingly utilized to manage presidential image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several communication scholars have looked at the visual aspects in areas such as public diplomacy (Kinsey & Zatepilina, 2010;Lord, 2006;Nye, 2004), national imagery (Edwards & Winkler, 2008;James, 2006;Kamalipour, 1999;Kennedy, 2008), ideology (Cloud, 2008;Davis, 2005;Hariman & Lucaites, 2007Michalski & Gow, 2007), political rhetoric (Edwards & Winkler, 2008;Erickson, 2008), and representation of political candidates (Banning & Coleman, 2009). …”
Section: Visual Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%