2023
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.13255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues—ValueversusValues

Abstract: In this address, I discuss differences across investor and manager motivations for considering sustainable finance—value versus values motivations—and how these differences contribute to misunderstandings about environmental, social, and governance investment approaches. The finance research community has the ability and responsibility to help clear up these misunderstandings through additional research, which I suggest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
(213 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the ongoing debates in regulatory and business circles on policies to develop a green economy (European Commission, 2021;Starks, 2023), our study reveals that board characteristics have heterogenous effects on the discrepancy between green communication and operational practices. Thus, our study cautions policymakers and potential investors to pay regard to the characteristics of the board when evaluating the degree of alignment between environmental actions and environmental communication, recognizing the different attitudes to implement different legitimacy-seeking strategies and therefore creating incentives for firms to improve environmental performance together with increased communication efforts.…”
Section: Theoretical and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Given the ongoing debates in regulatory and business circles on policies to develop a green economy (European Commission, 2021;Starks, 2023), our study reveals that board characteristics have heterogenous effects on the discrepancy between green communication and operational practices. Thus, our study cautions policymakers and potential investors to pay regard to the characteristics of the board when evaluating the degree of alignment between environmental actions and environmental communication, recognizing the different attitudes to implement different legitimacy-seeking strategies and therefore creating incentives for firms to improve environmental performance together with increased communication efforts.…”
Section: Theoretical and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This predictive capability enables investors to identify companies that are not only performing well in terms of ESG criteria but are also on a trajectory to improve their sustainability practices over time. Moreover, AI algorithms can analyze the correlation between ESG performance and financial indicators, helping investors to identify sustainable investment opportunities that do not compromise on financial returns [4]. By leveraging AI in SRI, investors can thus align their investment portfolios with ethical values and sustainability goals, while also ensuring that their investments contribute positively to addressing global environmental and social challenges.…”
Section: Socially Responsible Investing (Sri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reader's convenience, Table A1 provides in its first two columns the objective of each SDG and its number. Sustainability per se is a broadly defined term (see [2]), and focusing on the SDGs provides guidelines on how to structure our research. In this research, we focus on a panel of European banks for various reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%