2011
DOI: 10.2307/41940522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

President Nixon’s Speeches and Toasts during His 1972 Trip to China: A Study in Diplomatic Rhetoric

Abstract: Although hailed by historians and political scientists as a pivotal moment in the reestablishment of U.S.-Sino relations, President Richard Nixon’s 1972 trip to China has received little attention from rhetoricians. The toasts and speeches Nixon presented during his trip are important rhetorical artifacts as they illustrate the intricate relationship between diplomatic and epideictic rhetoric. Nixon adroitly employed epideictic diplomatic rhetoric during his 1972 trip to convey diplomatic aims and accomplish d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…78 Nixon argued that his initiatives had replaced "the mere absence of war" with "the basis of a structure for peace." 79 U.S. politicians and diplomats spoke in similar terms about normalization with Vietnam and Cuba. Senator John McCain (R-AZ), a Vietnam War veteran, former prisoner of war, and a key leader in the U.S.-Vietnamese normalization process, equated "improving relations" with Hanoi to concluding "the final chapter of the war in Vietnam."…”
Section: When? the Importance Of Timingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…78 Nixon argued that his initiatives had replaced "the mere absence of war" with "the basis of a structure for peace." 79 U.S. politicians and diplomats spoke in similar terms about normalization with Vietnam and Cuba. Senator John McCain (R-AZ), a Vietnam War veteran, former prisoner of war, and a key leader in the U.S.-Vietnamese normalization process, equated "improving relations" with Hanoi to concluding "the final chapter of the war in Vietnam."…”
Section: When? the Importance Of Timingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…I en räcka artiklar publicerade i början av femtiotalet utvecklade kommunikationsforskaren Robert T. Oliver vad han ansåg vara en rad brister (men också möjligheter) i detta forskningsfält, ett arbete som också har kommit att utgöra grunden för mycket av den retoriskt inspirerade och orienterade forskning rörande diplomati och övertygande som vi ser i dag (se ex. Carcasson, 2000;Howell, 2008;Kelley, 1988;Lid Falkman, 2009;Yang, 2011). Vad Oliver här hävdade var att målet med en retorisk kritik av diplomatisk kommunikation var att "judge what they [politiker och diplomater] are doing and to help them to do it better" (1950, s. 25).…”
Section: Det Svåra I Att Representera En Suveränunclassified