2016
DOI: 10.1145/2897824.2925919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserving geometry and topology for fluid flows with thin obstacles and narrow gaps

Abstract: Fluid animation methods based on Eulerian grids have long struggled to resolve flows involving narrow gaps and thin solid features. Past approaches have artificially inflated or voxelized boundaries, although this sacrifices the correct geometry and topology of the fluid domain and prevents flow through narrow regions. We present a boundary-respecting fluid simulator that overcomes these challenges. Our solution is to intersect the solid boundary geometry with the cells of a background … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one could design a generalized Multigrid solver for two‐way coupling elastic bodies with incompressible fluids. Finally, it would be interesting to extend our method to thin shells using cut‐cell formulations [AB016].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one could design a generalized Multigrid solver for two‐way coupling elastic bodies with incompressible fluids. Finally, it would be interesting to extend our method to thin shells using cut‐cell formulations [AB016].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While its original formulation exhibits strong numerical diffusion, the Fluid-Implicit-Particle (FLIP) method was later used to mitigate this issue [3], [50]. Ando et al [51] further combined FLIP with adaptive particle sampling, while Cornels et al [52] combined FLIP with SPH; for flows with thin obstacles and narrow gaps, Azevedo et al [53] proposed a modified FLIP method. Additionally, Fu et al [54] addressed the issue of momentum conservation through a polynomial version PIC, based on an earlier affine version [55].…”
Section: Single-phase Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stronger two-way coupling between liquids and deformables [Zarifi and Batty 2017] and viscous liquids and solids [Takahashi and Lin 2019] extended previous fractional boundaries approaches. Cut-cells [Azevedo et al 2016;Edwards and Bridson 2014] detach distinct regions of the flow separated by boundaries in a topologically robust way, capturing arbitrarily thin boundaries and narrow gaps. Edwards et al [2014] coupled cut-cells with a p-adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin method for detailed water capturing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we propose an Eulerian fluid solver which captures subgrid features such as thin liquid splashes, narrow air spaces and droplets on regular grids (Figure 2), while still largely conserving the volumes of the embedded liquids. Since our approach is an extension of the cut-cells method [Azevedo et al 2016], it can also naturally handle liquids interacting with complex obstacles (Figures 3 and 6). Our method is enabled by a novel Laplacian solver that handles non grid-aligned Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%