2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserved hemostatic status in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In plasma samples, markers of primary haemostasis (platelet count, von Willebrand factor [VWF], ADAMTS13), coagulation (factor VIII, prothrombin time [PT], international normalised ratio [INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], antithrombin and fibrinogen) and thrombin generation (F1 + 2, thrombin‐anti‐thrombin complexes [TAT]) were quantified as previously described . Plasma fibrinolytic capacity was measured utilising a plasma‐based clot lysis time assay, also described previously . Plasma thrombin generating potential was measured in vitro in the presence and absence of thrombomodulin by calibrated automated thrombography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In plasma samples, markers of primary haemostasis (platelet count, von Willebrand factor [VWF], ADAMTS13), coagulation (factor VIII, prothrombin time [PT], international normalised ratio [INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], antithrombin and fibrinogen) and thrombin generation (F1 + 2, thrombin‐anti‐thrombin complexes [TAT]) were quantified as previously described . Plasma fibrinolytic capacity was measured utilising a plasma‐based clot lysis time assay, also described previously . Plasma thrombin generating potential was measured in vitro in the presence and absence of thrombomodulin by calibrated automated thrombography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the assessment of the cirrhotic platelet was that it was dysfunctional and predisposed the patient to a bleeding tendency [89,90]. More recently, however, investigators have found that the activity of cirrhotic platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis is potentially preserved [91] or even increased [92], although there are conflicting data [93]. As recently reviewed [94], the function of platelets in various types of liver injury is quite complex, with multiple situation-specific factors determining whether platelets will play a profibrotic role versus an antifibrotic, pro-regenerative role.…”
Section: Plateletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to issues with the platelet aggregation test, the interpretation of markers of in vivo platelet activation is complex, because these markers are cleared by the liver such that elevated levels may not reflect in vivo platelet activation, but rather reflect accumulation of these markers due to a lack of clearance . Reliable approaches to study platelet functionality in cirrhosis thus appear restricted to studies on platelets themselves, such as by platelet count–adjusted aggregometry, platelet count–adjusted studies of platelet adhesion and aggregation under conditions of flow, or flow cytometric analyses …”
Section: Examples Of Published Studies On In Vivo Activation and Ex Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Reliable approaches to study platelet functionality in cirrhosis thus appear restricted to studies on platelets themselves, such as by platelet count-adjusted aggregometry, (1) platelet count-adjusted studies of platelet adhesion and aggregation under conditions of flow, (11) or flow cytometric analyses. (7) Flow cytometry can both identify the in vivo platelet activation status (for example, by measurements of platelet-monocyte aggregates as performed in the study by Raparelli et al, or by assessment of markers of platelet activation on the platelet itself) and platelet function after stimulation, which is (in contrast to aggregometry) independent of the platelet count within the sample. However, an analysis of the literature on unequivocal assays of platelet function reveals that there is no consensus ( Table 1).…”
Section: Caldwell and Lisman Hepatology February 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%