2013
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.1985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation of reliability classes under the formation of coherent systems

Abstract: The preservation of reliability aging classes under the formation of coherent systems is a relevant topic in reliability theory. Thus, it is well known that the new better than used class is preserved under the formation of coherent systems with independent components. However, surprisingly, the increasing failure rate class is not preserved in the independent and identically distributed case, that is, the components may have the (negative) aging increasing failure rate property, but the system does not have t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(53 reference statements)
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This property is not always true (see Navarro and Shaked ). Also, similar results can be derived for systems with dependent identically distributed components by using the conditions given in Navarro et al , (Theorem 2.4) for the hazard rate order and the conditions given in Navarro et al , for the preservation of the DFR class under the formation of the systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This property is not always true (see Navarro and Shaked ). Also, similar results can be derived for systems with dependent identically distributed components by using the conditions given in Navarro et al , (Theorem 2.4) for the hazard rate order and the conditions given in Navarro et al , for the preservation of the DFR class under the formation of the systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…□ Remark In the proof of Theorem , a system with just one unit ( X ) was used as a ‘facilitator’ to obtain comparisons in the dispersive order when the component lifetimes are DFR. From Theorem and the results given in Navarro et al , , one can use as a ‘facilitator’ any mixed system which preserves the DFR class such as the series systems with i.i.d. components. Remark Under Condition (iii) in Theorem , that is, when the component lifetimes are i.i.d.…”
Section: Systems With Identical Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark Still for a binary system with binary components, an alternative representation of the reliability function can be expressed in terms of a distorted distribution, or aggregation, of the marginal survival functions of the different components. The form of such a function of course depends on both the system's structure function ϕ and on the survival copula K of the vector of components' lifetimes (see, in particular, other works). By comparing, for any fixed ϕ , such a copula‐based representation of reliability with the one based on a potential extension of formula , one may establish a relation between the probabilities double-struckP()X1:n=Xπfalse(1false),,Xn1:n=Xπfalse(n1false),Xn:n=Xπfalse(nfalse) and double-struckP()TS>tfalse|X1:n=Xπfalse(1false),,Xn1:n=Xπfalse(n1false),Xn:n=Xπfalse(nfalse) on one side and the copula K on the other side.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, by applying the inclusion–exclusion formula to (1), we infer (see, e.g., ) that the system reliability function true F ¯ T can be written as true F ¯ T ( t ) = Q ¯ ( true F ¯ 1 ( t ) , , true F ¯ n ( t ) ) for all t , where Q ¯ : [ 0 , 1 ] n [ 0 , 1 ] is a continuous increasing function such that Q ¯ ( bold0 n ) = 0 and Q ¯ ( bold1 n ) = 1 , where bold0 n and bold1 n are the n ‐dimensional vectors ( 0 , , 0 ) and ( 1 , , 1 ) , respectively. true Q ¯ is called a generalized distortion (or a continuous aggregation function ).…”
Section: Bounds For Systems With Ordered Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%