1976
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4203(76)90002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation of enzymic activity in marine plankton by low-temperature freezing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ahmed et al (1976) found that ETS activity and GDH activity in whole cells of marine phytoplankton could be preserved without loss for up to 1 yr in liquid nitrogen, but Clayton (1986) reported losses of activity in S. costatum NR of up to 40% immediately after freezing in liquid nitrogen. Such losses were not found in this study, suggesting that in field situations samples could be frozen in liquid nitrogen for later analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed et al (1976) found that ETS activity and GDH activity in whole cells of marine phytoplankton could be preserved without loss for up to 1 yr in liquid nitrogen, but Clayton (1986) reported losses of activity in S. costatum NR of up to 40% immediately after freezing in liquid nitrogen. Such losses were not found in this study, suggesting that in field situations samples could be frozen in liquid nitrogen for later analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Half of the frozen samples were then transferred to a conventional deep freeze (-15°C) and the other half stored in liquid nitrogen (-196°C Ahmed et al (1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar differences are reported for long-term storing. Ahmed et al (1976), Ikeda & Skjoldal (1980 and Ikeda & Hing Fay (1981) apparently recorded good results with freezing and storing their samples (of whole organisms) at -20°C, but others (with homogenized samples) did not (Packard 1971, BAmstedt 1980. Apparently many factors influence the ETS activity in the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%