2020
DOI: 10.1670/19-012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation-Induced Morphological Change in Salamanders and Failed DNA Extraction from a Decades-Old Museum Specimen: Implications for Plethodon ainsworthi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preservation is known to alter morphology in amphibians (e.g., Pierson et al 2020). However, a previous study found little difference in anuran evolutionary eye-body allometry based on fresh vs. preserved specimens and found similar patterns of eye scaling compared to SVL or wet mass (Thomas et al 2020).…”
Section: Morphological Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preservation is known to alter morphology in amphibians (e.g., Pierson et al 2020). However, a previous study found little difference in anuran evolutionary eye-body allometry based on fresh vs. preserved specimens and found similar patterns of eye scaling compared to SVL or wet mass (Thomas et al 2020).…”
Section: Morphological Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head width (HW; maximum width of the head), snout–gular length (tip of snout to gular fold), snout–vent length (SVL; tip of snout to posterior margin of vent), axilla–groin (AG) or trunk length (distance between limbs), and tail length (posterior edge of vent to tail tip) were measured using 823 A. hardii , 452 A. aeneus , 358 A. ferreus , 426 A. flavipunctatus , and 363 A. lugubris specimens from the collections of the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ), University of California at Berkeley, Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH), University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ), the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), and specimens from the personal collections of R. Highton, J. Beatty, and the author (NLS) (see Supplementary Appendix S1). Specimens were only used if they had been fixed and processed in the same way (fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, rinsed in water, stored in 70% ethanol) to avoid inconsistent distortion of morphology ( Pierson et al. 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that may impact sample outcomes is the tissue type used for extractions. Studies seeking to extract DNA from formalin-fixed samples typically sample liver or muscle tissue (Hykin et al 2015, Ruane & Austin, 2017Pierson et al 2020). Hykin et al (2015) compared extraction success between these two tissue types and extracted higher yields from the liver replicates of Anolis lizard samples.…”
Section: Predictors Of Formalin-fixed Sample Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hykin et al (2015) compared extraction success between these two tissue types and extracted higher yields from the liver replicates of Anolis lizard samples. Ruane and Austin (2017) successfully extracted DNA from snake liver tissues, while Pierson et al (2020) were unable to extract suitable DNA for PCR or library preparation from salamander tail muscle. Here we compared success between muscle and liver replicates of specimen USNM 525133.…”
Section: Predictors Of Formalin-fixed Sample Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation