Presenting objective visual performance feedback over multiple sets of resistance exercise improves motivation, competitiveness, and performance

Wilson, Kyle M.; Joux, Neil R. de; Head, James; Helton, William S.; Dang, Jasmine S.; Weakley, Jonathon

doi:10.1177/1541931218621299

Cited by 19 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…While there is an abundance of research that assesses the kinetic and kinematic outputs of commercially available devices during resistance training [1,39,40], there has not been a review assessing the validity and reliability of these different forms of technology. Due to the growing use of this equipment during resistance training, it is appropriate that a systematic review is completed to guide practitioners and researchers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Monitoring resistance training has a range of unique difficulties due to differences in physical characteristics and capacity between athletes, and the indoor environment in which it often occurs. Traditionally, methods such as volume load have been used, but these have inherent flaws. In recent times, numerous portable and affordable devices have been made available that purport to accurately and reliably measure kinetic and kinematic outputs, potentially offering practitioners a means of measuring resistance training loads with confidence. However, a thorough and systematic review of the literature describing the reliability and validity of these devices has yet to be undertaken, which may lead to uncertainty from practitioners on the utility of these devices. Objective A systematic review of studies that investigate the validity and/or reliability of commercially available devices that quantify kinetic and kinematic outputs during resistance training. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Medline was performed; studies included were (1) original research investigations; (2) full-text articles written in English; (3) published in a peer-reviewed academic journal; and (4) assessed the validity and/or reliability of commercially available portable devices that quantify resistance training exercises. Results A total of 129 studies were retrieved, of which 47 were duplicates. The titles and abstracts of 82 studies were screened and the full text of 40 manuscripts were assessed. A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additional 13 studies, identified via reference list assessment, were included. Therefore, a total of 44 studies were included in this review. Conclusion Most of the studies within this review did not utilise a gold-standard criterion measure when assessing validity. This has likely led to under or overreporting of error for certain devices. Furthermore, studies that have quantified intra-device reliability have often failed to distinguish between technological and biological variability which has likely altered the true precision of each device. However, it appears linear transducers which have greater accuracy and reliability compared to other forms of device. Future research should endeavour to utilise gold-standard criterion measures across a broader range of exercises (including weightlifting movements) and relative loads.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The mean concentric velocity of all warm-up repetitions was monitored by a linear position transducer (GymAware, Kinetic Performance Technology, Canberra, Australia), which has shown to be a valid and reliable device [ 19 ], and used in previous acute and longitudinal resistance training research with a similar population [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Visual (i.e., the mean concentric barbell velocity) and verbal (e.g., words of encouragement) feedback was also provided following every repetition to support maximal concentric intent during resistance training [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training

Pearson

García-Ramos

Morrison

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exercise velocity and relative velocity loss thresholds (VLTs) are commonly used in velocity-based resistance training. This study aims to quantify the between-day reliability of 10%, 20%, and 30% VLTs on kinetic and kinematic outputs, changes in external load, and repetition characteristics in well-trained athletes. Using a repeated, counter-balanced crossover design, twelve semi-professional athletes completed five sets of the back squat with an external load corresponding to a mean concentric velocity of ~0.70 m·s−1 and a VLT applied. The testing sessions were repeated after four weeks of unstructured training to assess the long-term reliability of each VLT. A coefficient of variation (CV) <10% was used to classify outputs as reliable. Kinetic and kinematic outputs and external load were largely reliable, with only peak power during sets 2–5 within the 10% VLT condition demonstrating a CV >10% (CV: 11.14–14.92%). Alternatively, the repetitions completed within each set showed large variation (CV: 18.92–67.49%). These findings demonstrate that by utilizing VLTs, kinetic and kinematic outputs can be prescribed and replicated across training mesocycles. Thus, for practitioners wishing to reliably control the kinetic and kinematic stimulus that is being applied to their athletes, it is advised that a velocity-based approach is used.

show abstract

“…29 Geri bildirim kullanımı üzerine yapılan araştırmaların çoğu HTA esnasında, görsel ve işitsel geri bildirim kullanımının sporcularda performansı artırdığını rapor etmektedir. 16,[30][31][32][33][34] HTA'DA KuLLANILAN HIz DEğişKENLERi VE MuTLAK HIz BöLGELERi HTA yönteminde hız, kullanılan yöntem ve parametrelere bağlı olarak çeşitli şekillerde ölçülebilir. Hızyük ilişkisi belirlenirken en sık kullanılan ölçümler ortalama hız (OH), ortalama itici hız (OİH) ve zirve hızdır (ZH).…”

Section: Direnç Antrenmanlarinda Hizin Kullanim Gerekçeleriunclassified

Current Approach to Resistance Training: Velocity-Based Training: Traditional Review

Çetin¹,

KAYA²,

SUNGUR³

et al. 2022

Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Presenting objective visual performance feedback over multiple sets of resistance exercise improves motivation, competitiveness, and performance

Cited by 19 publications

References 11 publications

The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review

The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review

Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training

Current Approach to Resistance Training: Velocity-Based Training: Traditional Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About