2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10433-017-0418-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presenteeism, stress resilience, and physical activity in older manual workers: a person-centred analysis

Abstract: This study used a person-centred approach to explore typologies of older manual workers based on presenteeism, stress resilience, and physical activity. Older manual workers ( = 217; 69.1% male; age range 50-77; age = 57.11 years; SD = 5.62) from a range of UK-based organisations, representing different manual job roles, took part in the study. A cross-sectional survey design was used. Based on the three input variables: presenteeism, stress resilience and physical activity, four distinct profiles were identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bearing in mind the cross-sectional nature of these data, these findings suggest that individuals who are well resourced to bounce back from adversity are better equipped to engage in higher amounts of walking activity. Research exploring this association between resilience and PA has mainly been focused at higher intensities of PA (Thogersen-Ntoumani, Black, Lindwall, Whittaker, & Balanos, 2017); thus, further work is needed to disentangle the association at all intensities of PA. Together, these findings are important, as moderate-to-vigorous PA is the most important form of activity for individuals to improve their fitness, and gain its related health benefits (Garber et al, 2011), and sedentary behavior (sitting time) has consistently been shown to be associated with numerous deleterious outcomes (Australian National Preventive Health Agency, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing in mind the cross-sectional nature of these data, these findings suggest that individuals who are well resourced to bounce back from adversity are better equipped to engage in higher amounts of walking activity. Research exploring this association between resilience and PA has mainly been focused at higher intensities of PA (Thogersen-Ntoumani, Black, Lindwall, Whittaker, & Balanos, 2017); thus, further work is needed to disentangle the association at all intensities of PA. Together, these findings are important, as moderate-to-vigorous PA is the most important form of activity for individuals to improve their fitness, and gain its related health benefits (Garber et al, 2011), and sedentary behavior (sitting time) has consistently been shown to be associated with numerous deleterious outcomes (Australian National Preventive Health Agency, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hildon et al , 2008; Luthans et al , 2006). Additionally, it is postulated that specific HR practices, such as mindfulness training, may be useful for enhancing employee resilience (Thogersen-Ntoumani et al , 2017). Future studies could examine the impact of those types of programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focused on perceived HRM practices as antecedents of resilience, but there are also factors inside and outside working life, such as social networks, which are likely to influence resilience (see, e.g., Hildon et al, 2008;Luthans et al, 2006). Additionally, it is postulated that specific HR practices, such as mindfulness training, may be useful for enhancing employee resilience (Thogersen-Ntoumani et al, 2017). Future studies could examine the impact of those types of programs.…”
Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take responsibility for the work to be done was of greater importance than to take responsibility for one's own health. Furthermore, the employees thought that working while sick was about relations to others, and to be home on sick leave might cause stress for their coworkers [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%