Presentation to publication: proportion of abstracts published for ESPR, SPR and IPR

Shelmerdine, Susan C.; Lynch, Jeremy Oliver; Langan, Dean; Arthurs, Owen J.

doi:10.1007/s00247-016-3653-4

Cited by 15 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If published on association websites, the abstracts may be made available only to attendees of the specific meeting or members of the organization [31]. Furthermore, conference and meeting abstracts often do not result in full-length publications [32][33][34], with one study showing that of a total of 29,729 abstracts presented at scientific meetings, the rate of weighted mean abstracts that were fully published was 44.5% [35]. This suggests that the conference and meeting abstracts are the only source of a large portion of scientific information.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of institutional repositories: a systematic review

Demetres

Delgado

Wright

2020

jmla

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Institutional repositories are platforms for presenting and publicizing scholarly output that might not be suitable to publish in a peer-reviewed journal or that must meet open access requirements. However, there are many challenges associated with their launch and up-keep. The objective of this systematic review was to define the impacts of institutional repositories (IRs) on an academic institution, thus justifying their implementation and/or maintenance.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (Wiley), ERIC (ProQuest), Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus (Elsevier), and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (EBSCO). A total of 6,593 citations were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results: Thirteen included studies were divided into 3 areas of impact: citation count, exposure or presence, and administrative impact. Those focusing on citation count (n=5) and exposure or presence (n=7) demonstrated positive impacts of IRs on institutions and researchers. One study focusing on administrative benefit demonstrated the utility of IRs in automated population of ORCID profiles.Conclusion: Based on the available literature, IRs appear to have a positive impact on citation count, exposure or presence, and administrative burden. To draw stronger conclusions, more and higher-quality studies are needed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of institutional repositories: a systematic review

Demetres

Delgado

Wright

2020

jmla

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These rates vary from 9% to 51.8% at national or international conferences. [15][16][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] To date, the only dedicated sonography conference with a documented conference abstract to publication rate is the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) annual meeting (22.8%). 29 To the author's knowledge, this will be the first study investigating the abstract to publication rates of sonography conferences in Australasia.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Use of Google Scholar, PubMed and Google databases were undertaken following methodology described by others. [15][16][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27]29,31 Abstract titles, key words, institutions and/or authors' names and locations were used to find peer-reviewed papers. Identified papers were authenticated through open access, publicly available author information or library access.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of recent Australasian Sonographers Association (ASA) conference abstracts: How many progress to publication?

Pinson

2020

Sonography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality healthcare relies on our practitioners and their health services to provide the optimal standard of care. To support current practice, we need to embed a research culture in all health professions. 1 Undertaking research helps gather the evidence to provide solutions to clinical problems, thus consolidating best practice. The Australian Government has supported this initiative with establishment of research positions in allied health to build and develop a research culture. 1-3 Often underpinned by policy and governance development, 4 healthcare institutions participating in research are more efficient, and have significant impact upon patient outcomes. 5 A requirement of clinical research positions is to establish a research culture and present completed clinical research performed to a wider audience. There is an expectation to demonstrate impact of the research undertaken, 6 and an ethical

show abstract

“…Work presented in abstract form at SCCM meetings was published in journals with higher impact factor (mean, 3.38), compared to AAP and PAS (mean, 1.92 and 2.64, respectively). Subspecialties ranging from ophthalmology to radiology to orthopedic surgery have documented similar rates of abstracts that become published and mean time to publication (3, 4, 7). There have been very few reports from the field of pediatrics (8, 9) and to our knowledge, this is the first such report in the field of critical care.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PCCM has large sections at AAP, PAS and SCCM, which makes the selection of these three meetings for the Basu and Pollack study appropriate. With limited exceptions (4), most studies of abstract-to-manuscript success have evaluated data from a single conference (3, 9, 11). Including multiple meetings could be beneficial in eliminating potential bias stemming from a single conference’s abstract acceptance rate, or location or timing of one particular meeting.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%