When I was a resident, my leader taught me that the gold standard for patients with stress incontinence is the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz (MMK) procedure. But a few years later, urologists who could perform advanced techniques showed me needle suspension as the best method at a urological meeting. Fortunately my boss gave me a chance for a hand-to-hand lesson of the stamay procedure by the specialist. Since then, I have been selecting this procedure for a few years. Without doubt, this needle suspension was the gold standard at that time.But now most urologists do not select this technique because of bad results. After I had mastered the technique of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), I could see the smiling faces of patients after the operation. At that time I believed that TVT would be the gold standard for this condition. But the present status is what you know.Recently most specialists, including myself, believe that using 'mesh' is the best operation for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Is this tendency good for the patients in the long run? No one can predict the results of this procedure more than ten years from now.God knows what procedure will be the gold standard in the future.
Urinary stress incontinenceIs transobturator tape the first choice for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence?Transobturator tape (TOT), which was introduced by Delorme 1 in 2001 after the introduction of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) by Ulmsten in 1996, is also a minimally invasive midurethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Although TVT has become one of the most popular continence operations worldwide because of its efficacy, safety, and the low recurrence rate, major complications such as bowel injury and vascular injury have been reported.2 Since those complications can be fatal, TOT has been developed to prevent them.A systematic search of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE), which monitors voluntary reporting of complications of the use of devices in midurethral slings, revealed 33 cases of bowel injury (4.7%), six of them fatal, among 700 major complications following the use of TVT. It also revealed 32 cases of vascular injury, two of them fatal.2 When major complications were defined as bladder perforation, urethral perforation, nerve injury, and sepsis, in addition to bowel injury and vascular injury, they accounted for 20% of the complications of midurethral slings in the MAUDE database. However, according to published reports, major complications of midurethral slings accounted for 5.2% of all complications, and there were no reports of fatalities. In other words, reports of complications have not been made compulsory, and since they are the result of self reports, the complications we were able to learn about from the published reports seem to be the tip of the iceberg in terms of the actual numbers that have occurred. TVT is passed retropubically in a blind manner, whereas TOT is passed via a la...