1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-6505(99)00029-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present status and remaining problems of HDR/HWR system design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulation results presented in this paper confirm advantages of CO 2 over water as heat transmission fluid for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), predicting larger energy extraction rates for CO 2 for the same applied pressures in injection and production wells. The mobility (= density/viscosity) of CO 2 depends in complicated fashion on both temperature and pressure, which gives rise to unusual features in the time dependence of mass flow and heat extraction rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical simulation results presented in this paper confirm advantages of CO 2 over water as heat transmission fluid for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), predicting larger energy extraction rates for CO 2 for the same applied pressures in injection and production wells. The mobility (= density/viscosity) of CO 2 depends in complicated fashion on both temperature and pressure, which gives rise to unusual features in the time dependence of mass flow and heat extraction rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As pointed out by Brown, CO 2 has certain thermophysical and chemical properties that could make it attractive as a heat transfer medium. Water losses present a serious obstacle to commercialization of water-based EGS [2], while fluid losses in an EGS operated with CO 2 could achieve geologic storage of CO 2 as an ancillary benefit. An additional motivating factor for exploring CO 2 as working fluid is that water-based EGS face significant technical difficulties from mineral dissolution and precipitation, due to strong chemical interactions between rocks and aqueous fluids at geothermal temperatures [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For conventional EGS projects, water is used as the circulating fluid to extract thermal energy (ie, H 2 O‐EGS). However, H 2 O‐EGS projects are associated with some problems, with regard to the amount of water loss, forming scale in ground conveying pipes, and heat exchange equipment . Thus, the use of supercritical CO 2 (SCCO 2 ) instead of water as the heat extraction fluid was proposed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional EGS uses water as the heat-carrying medium, and there are a lot of researches on this technology at home and abroad [8][9][10][11]; it is found that the heat extraction of H 2 O-EGS has great advantages in the presence of in situ fluid in the reservoir [12]. However, some scholars pointed out that the use of H 2 O-EGS will cause a lot of water resource loss [13] and also cause a series of problems that are not conducive to the operation and maintenance of geothermal system [14][15][16][17]. To solve these problems, in 2000, Brown first proposed that it can use supercritical CO 2 (SCCO 2 ) instead of water as a heat-carrying medium [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%