1979
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/20/5-6/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present State of the Calculation of Radiative Lifetimes of Molecules

Abstract: where M for a dipole allowed transition is the operator Present state of the calculation of radiative lifetimes of molecules. Jens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 However, the conversion of lifetime measurements to "electronic OSCillator strengths" rests on the assumptions that the branching ratios from the B and C states to the A in state is known and that the electronic tranSition moments vary slowly with internuclear separation. 32 The first assumption is the most crucial one and a change in the estimates of the branching ratios may give a sizeable change in the "experimental" oscillator strengths, thus leading to experimental results in and experimental estimates of the equilibrium electronic oscillator strengths did not agree nearly as well. This difference is caused by the variation in electronic transition moment with the internuclear separation.…”
Section: Numerical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 However, the conversion of lifetime measurements to "electronic OSCillator strengths" rests on the assumptions that the branching ratios from the B and C states to the A in state is known and that the electronic tranSition moments vary slowly with internuclear separation. 32 The first assumption is the most crucial one and a change in the estimates of the branching ratios may give a sizeable change in the "experimental" oscillator strengths, thus leading to experimental results in and experimental estimates of the equilibrium electronic oscillator strengths did not agree nearly as well. This difference is caused by the variation in electronic transition moment with the internuclear separation.…”
Section: Numerical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is caused by the variation in electronic transition moment with the internuclear separation. 32 The calculation of the dipole polarizability is strongly affected by the" density -shift" terms and the second order term in the metric matrix. The least important term in the (positive) extra 2p -2h term, W~ [see Eq.…”
Section: Numerical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the dipole matrix element occurring in equation (13) are non zero for the µ x and µ y components of the dipole operator, and the extension of equations (11) and (13) to the case of more than one singlet or/and triplet Π state is straightforward.…”
Section: B Spin-orbit Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) taking into account only the electronic contribution, computed at a fixed nuclear configuration, namely, that corresponding to the equilibrium geometry of the excited emitting state jai (U-F bond distance: 2.147 Å ), using the electronic spin-orbit wavefunctions of states ja g a i and jb g b i and the m 2 ab values obtained are, therefore, an approximation to more accurate values that would include the effects of vibrations [13].…”
Section: Methods and Details Of The Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the values of DE ab are expressed in cm À1 and those of m ab in au, this expression, for A ab in ns À1 , becomes: [13]). In turn, the lifetime for spontaneous emission from state ja g a i, t, has been calculated as [13,14] t…”
Section: Methods and Details Of The Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%