2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-013-0712-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present genetic structure revealed by microsatellites reflects recent history of the Finnish moose (Alces alces)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studied moose populations, the number of alleles ranged from 4 (locus MAF46 in the Srokowo State Forest) to 12 (locus McM58 in the Biebrza Valley). These results are generally consistent with reports for other moose populations (Schmidt et al 2009;Kangas et al 2013). For example, in the Finnish moose population, the number of alleles per locus ranged from 5 to 15 (Kangas et al 2013) and in Alaska moose from 3 to 12 (Schmidt et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the studied moose populations, the number of alleles ranged from 4 (locus MAF46 in the Srokowo State Forest) to 12 (locus McM58 in the Biebrza Valley). These results are generally consistent with reports for other moose populations (Schmidt et al 2009;Kangas et al 2013). For example, in the Finnish moose population, the number of alleles per locus ranged from 5 to 15 (Kangas et al 2013) and in Alaska moose from 3 to 12 (Schmidt et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For the total sample, the observed heterozygosity (H O ) ranged from 0.594 (locus McM58) to 0.770 (locus MAF46), averaging 0.769 across loci, while expected heterozygosity (H E ) ranged from 0.688 (MAF70) to 0.874 (BM1225; Table 2). Among all the moose populations studied so far, average H E across loci was highest in eastern Poland (0.781; Table 2): slightly higher than in the moose population from Finland (Kangas et al 2013) and considerably higher than in other moose populations from Sweden (Charlier et al 2008), Norway (Haanes et al 2011), Alaska (Schmidt et al 2009), and Canada ; Table 2). Although we examined about three times fewer individuals than in the Norwegian study and despite our samples represented a much smaller area, the H E value we obtained for eastern Poland was somewhat higher than for the population in Norway (0.630-0.650; Haanes et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heterozygosity ( H E ) of European moose that we detected was high in most study sites (range 0.57–0.74) and is within the range previously reported from Fennoscandia ( H E = 0.57–0.75: Charlier et al ., ; Haanes et al ., ; Kangas et al ., ) and slightly higher than in North America ( H E = 0.45–0.64: Hundertmark, ; Schmidt et al ., ). For mtDNA, haplotype diversity is greatest in Asia, followed by North America and Europe (Niedziałkowska et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This differentiation has been variously explained with ancient and/or more recent events (Charlier et al ., ; Haanes et al ., ; Świsłocka et al ., ). Moreover, significant spatial genetic structure has been detected within the Finnish moose population (Kangas et al ., ; Niedziałkowska et al ., ), although the exact location(s) of subpopulation boundaries and the levels of admixture remain unclear. All previous genetic studies on moose applied either nuclear or sex‐linked markers alone, limiting their capability to disentangle the underlying mechanisms behind the population structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%