2009
DOI: 10.11609/jott.o1955.203-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present distribution, population status, and conservation of Western Hoolock Gibbons Hoolock hoolock (Primates: Hylobatidae) in Namdapha National Park, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings, i.e. a mean group size of 3.6 individuals for 9 groups, is closely comparable to other studies conducted in different parts of the H. hoolock distribution range, as reported in Kumar et al [2009], i.e. 3.2 individuals for 24 groups and 3.4 for 7 groups [Tilson, 1979], 3.1 for 8 groups and 3.0 for 14 groups [Choudhury, 1990[Choudhury, , 1991 in Assam, 3-3.2 for 6-10 groups [Mukherjee, 1982], 2.1 for 34 groups [Gupta, 1994] in Tripura, 3.0 individuals for 42 groups [Alfred and Sati, 1990] in Meghalaya, 3.5 for 6 groups [Gittins and Tilson, 1984], 2.3 for 5 groups and 2.9 for 15 groups [Ahsan, 1984[Ahsan, , 1994, and 2.9 for 13 groups [Feeroz and Islam, 1992] in Bangladesh ( table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present findings, i.e. a mean group size of 3.6 individuals for 9 groups, is closely comparable to other studies conducted in different parts of the H. hoolock distribution range, as reported in Kumar et al [2009], i.e. 3.2 individuals for 24 groups and 3.4 for 7 groups [Tilson, 1979], 3.1 for 8 groups and 3.0 for 14 groups [Choudhury, 1990[Choudhury, , 1991 in Assam, 3-3.2 for 6-10 groups [Mukherjee, 1982], 2.1 for 34 groups [Gupta, 1994] in Tripura, 3.0 individuals for 42 groups [Alfred and Sati, 1990] in Meghalaya, 3.5 for 6 groups [Gittins and Tilson, 1984], 2.3 for 5 groups and 2.9 for 15 groups [Ahsan, 1984[Ahsan, , 1994, and 2.9 for 13 groups [Feeroz and Islam, 1992] in Bangladesh ( table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the near future, there is a high probability of extinction for several fragmented populations [Molur et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2009]. In the present study, fragmentation of habitat appears to have had no immediate impact on group size; however, its effect in the long term should be the subject of further study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean group size of Western hoolock gibbons in Cachar district has been found to be smaller when compared with average mean group size from the entire state of Assam which is 3.2 (Das et al, 2009). Similar to the present study, Kumar et al (2009) reported a mean group size of 2.5 individuals for 20 groups from Arunachal Pradesh. A considerably small mean group size of 2.1 for 34 groups in Tripura was also reported (Gupta, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is very important to understand the fundamental link between this species and its habitat for formulation of effective conservation plans (Das et al, 2005, Ray et al, 2015. The habitat of Western hoolock gibbons in Cachar district includes forest patches inside tea estates, village woodlots near forest fringes and small tree cladded areas which are in contrast to the reported habitats of Western hoolock gibbons in other parts of India that are tropical and subtropical evergreen, tropical wet evergreen, tropical semi-evergreen, tropical moist deciduous, and sub-tropical hill forests (Kumar et al, 2009). The forests of Cachar district have historically been ill-utilized and misappropriated especially during the British colonial rule and hardly any management strategy was adopted by the Indian government since then in order to maintain these forests as functional ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%