2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence of parabens in children’s faeces. Optimization and validation of a new analytical method based on the use of ultrasound-assisted extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, these chemicals were found at higher DFs and concentrations in feces (median: 2.75 – 22.0 and 2.87–27.0 ng/g ww in dog and cat feces, respectively) (Table S8), which suggested that fecal elimination is also an important route of excretion of these chemicals. The concentrations of MeP, EtP, and PrP measured in our study (mean: 9.96 – 79.6 and 6.37–51.0 ng/g dw in dog and cat feces, respectively) were similar to those measured in children’s feces (mean: 2.95–102 ng/g dw) . The median concentrations of MeP and PrP in dog urine (0.84 and 0.04 μg/g creatinine, respectively) were 34 and 79 times lower than those reported for human urine from the United States (28.8 and 3.17 μg/g creatinine, respectively) (Figure ), which can be explained by the use of cosmetics by humans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, these chemicals were found at higher DFs and concentrations in feces (median: 2.75 – 22.0 and 2.87–27.0 ng/g ww in dog and cat feces, respectively) (Table S8), which suggested that fecal elimination is also an important route of excretion of these chemicals. The concentrations of MeP, EtP, and PrP measured in our study (mean: 9.96 – 79.6 and 6.37–51.0 ng/g dw in dog and cat feces, respectively) were similar to those measured in children’s feces (mean: 2.95–102 ng/g dw) . The median concentrations of MeP and PrP in dog urine (0.84 and 0.04 μg/g creatinine, respectively) were 34 and 79 times lower than those reported for human urine from the United States (28.8 and 3.17 μg/g creatinine, respectively) (Figure ), which can be explained by the use of cosmetics by humans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The concentrations of MeP, EtP, and PrP measured in our study (mean: 9.96−79.6 and 6.37−51.0 ng/g dw in dog and cat feces, respectively) were similar to those measured in children's feces (mean: 2.95−102 ng/g dw). 21 The median concentrations of MeP and PrP in dog urine (0.84 and 0.04 μg/g creatinine, respectively) were 34 and 79 times lower than those reported for human urine from the United States (28.8 and 3.17 μg/g creatinine, respectively) (Figure 3), which can be explained by the use of cosmetics by humans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations