Prescribing high-intensity interval exercise by rating of perceived exertion in young individuals

Marçal, Isabela Roque; Falqueiro, Pedro Guilherme de Mattos; Fernandes, Bianca; Ngomane, Awassi Yuphiwa; Amaral, Vanessa Teixeira do; Guimarães, Guilherme; Ciolac, Emmanuel Gomes

doi:10.23736/s0022-4707.20.11449-x

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ciolac et al [26] identified that there was no significant difference in treadmill speed between self-regulated prescriptions, respectively, with RPE categories between 9 and 11 and prescriptions regulated with 50% of HRreserve (RPE prescription 5.7 km • h -1 and HR prescription 5.7 km • h -1 ), and for RPE categories between 15 and 17 and prescriptions regulated with 70% of HRreserve (RPE prescription 7.8 km • h -1 and HR prescription 8.2 km • h -1 ) . Similarly, Marçal et al [36] observed no significant difference between highintensity interval exercise prescriptions autoregulated by RPE and prescriptions adjusted with HRreserve at the same intensity level. these findings reaffirm what had already been observed by Paulson et al [28] on the accuracy of prescriptions with RPE to describe the same speed of prescriptions imposed at 70% O 2 peak for dislocation on an ergometric treadmill for wheelchair users (RPE prescription 1.8 m • s -1 and speed prescription 1.6 m • s -1 ).…”

Section: Research Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…A total of 1434 references were found. After applying the criteria established as guiding criteria for inclusion, 15 studies were considered eligible for review [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][33][34][35][36][37]. the description of article selection Human Movement, Vol.…”

Section: Research Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…HR was the most used criterion measure for validation of the RPE scale. the 4 studies showed parity between the measurements obtained in the different prescription types, presenting differences from 0.00 to -6.00 bpm [26][27][28]36]. In contrast to these findings, Smutok et al [35] demonstrated through regression analyses that HR measurements from RPE-regulated intensity prescriptions could be significantly different from those obtained during conventional prescriptions.…”

Section: Research Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…three studies tested the validated Borg 6-20 scale using performance measures as criteria [26,28,36]. ciolac et al [26] identified that there was no significant difference in treadmill speed between self-regulated prescriptions, respectively, with RPE categories between 9 and 11 and prescriptions regulated with 50% of HRreserve (RPE prescription 5.7 km • h -1 and HR prescription 5.7 km • h -1 ), and for RPE categories between 15 and 17 and prescriptions regulated with 70% of HRreserve (RPE prescription 7.8 km • h -1 and HR prescription 8.2 km • h -1 ) .…”

Section: Research Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…there is an idea that an individual is able to use their sensorial cortex to interpret physiological changes (peripheral and central) during exercise and then to self-regulate the intensity using the RPE scale. However, most of the studies analysed showed that the recommendation of this tool for exercise prescription may not be an accurate strategy if compared with conventional prescriptions based on physiological and performance variables [16,19,22,[26][27][28]36].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Validity of the Borg 6–20 categories obtegories obtained in incremental testing for prescribing aerobic exercise intensity: a systematic review

Souza¹,

Campos²,

Gonçalves³

et al. 2022

Hum Mov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. Self-regulation of exercise intensity with the Borg 6-20 scale seems a promising alternative, since the magnitude of effort is regulated by internal factors inherent to the individual and their perception of effort during the activity. In order to verify this hypothesis, some studies have tested the validity of the Borg 6-20 scale for prescribing exercise intensity. the study aim was to review the literature and verify the validity of the Borg 6-20 scale in aerobic exercise prescription. Methods. the PIcOS strategy was used to conduct the search for evidence concerning the objectives of the review as recommended by PRISMA-P. the level and quality of evidence were analysed by using the cochrane collaboration's recommendation for systematic reviews. Results. A total of 1434 references were found. After applying the criteria of inclusion, 15 studies were considered eligible for review. these studies generally tested the validity of intensity-regulated prescriptions with rating of perceived exertion (RPE) by comparing physiological and performance measures obtained in incremental tests or conventional prescriptions with the measures generated by prescriptions regulated with the Borg 6-20 scale. In addition, some studies evaluated the reliability and reproducibility of RPE-regulated prescriptions by comparing physiological and performance measures obtained from different intensity-regulated exercise sessions with the Borg 6-20 scale. Conclusions. According to the studies investigated in this systematic review, the recommendation of the Borg 6-20 scale in exercise prescription is not yet a valid alternative to describe similar intensity magnitudes to physiological and performance variables.

show abstract

Section: Research Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 91%