2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed fires as ecological surrogates for wildfires: A stream and riparian perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the long term, net losses of N by combustion and streamwater export will be offset by N-fixation and atmospheric deposition (Smithwick et al, 2005). In contrast to wildfires, low-severity spring prescribed burns did not provide the stream ecosystem with potentially important nutrient pulses (Arkle and Pilliod, 2010). Whereas chronic N inputs from atmospheric or other pollution will lead to detrimental effects on water quality and aquatic organisms, short-term inputs of post-fire N, as often observed after wildfires, may be critical for the productivity of often N-limited aquatic ecosystems while not impairing water quality.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the long term, net losses of N by combustion and streamwater export will be offset by N-fixation and atmospheric deposition (Smithwick et al, 2005). In contrast to wildfires, low-severity spring prescribed burns did not provide the stream ecosystem with potentially important nutrient pulses (Arkle and Pilliod, 2010). Whereas chronic N inputs from atmospheric or other pollution will lead to detrimental effects on water quality and aquatic organisms, short-term inputs of post-fire N, as often observed after wildfires, may be critical for the productivity of often N-limited aquatic ecosystems while not impairing water quality.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To determine if certain combinations of landcover types were important predictors of sage-grouse occupancy, we performed a non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMS) ordination of landcover data for each plot using PC-ORD 6.09 software (McCune and Mefford 2011). This analysis was conducted as in Arkle and Pilliod (2010), but without transformations. We used the three axis scores v www.esajournals.org generated for each plot (in addition to values of individual landcover variables) as potential predictors in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Variable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescribed fire treatments were conducted under dry, low-wind conditions in early May 2004 (Parks site) and early May 2006 (Fitsum and Williams sites) using incendiary objects dropped from a helicopter and hand-held drip torches near treatment perimeters. Methods, guidelines, and treatment objectives were the same for all three prescribed fires and are described in Arkle and Pilliod (2010). The Parks treatment burned within a 1052 ha area (29% Unburned-Low, 57% Low, 13% Moderate, and 0.7% High severity).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%