2019
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed fire and partial overstory removal alter an acorn–rodent conditional mutualism

Abstract: In eastern North America, oak (Quercus) regeneration failure has spurred management using silvicultural approaches better aligned with the autecology of oaks. In particular, shelterwood harvests can create favorable intermediate light conditions for oak establishment and prescribed fire is predicted (by the oak–fire hypothesis) to favor oak regeneration. These approaches substantially modify forest structure and may affect crucial trophic interactions including the conditional mutualism between oaks and graniv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand how mutualistic interactions shape communities and ecosystems, we must identify the mechanisms that underlie their functioning. Synzoochory, for example, has been termed a “conditional mutualism” ( 22 , 23 ) since outcomes vary depending on several biotic and abiotic factors, such as the ratio of seeds to scatter hoarders, the composition of seeds available, soil moisture, fire events, tree density, and seasonal temperature and precipitation ( 22 , 24 27 ). If individual dispersers differ in their propensities to contribute in mutualistic or antagonistic manners, this would mean that certain individuals may be ultimately more important to the seed dispersal mutualism [i.e., keystone individuals ( 28 )].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand how mutualistic interactions shape communities and ecosystems, we must identify the mechanisms that underlie their functioning. Synzoochory, for example, has been termed a “conditional mutualism” ( 22 , 23 ) since outcomes vary depending on several biotic and abiotic factors, such as the ratio of seeds to scatter hoarders, the composition of seeds available, soil moisture, fire events, tree density, and seasonal temperature and precipitation ( 22 , 24 27 ). If individual dispersers differ in their propensities to contribute in mutualistic or antagonistic manners, this would mean that certain individuals may be ultimately more important to the seed dispersal mutualism [i.e., keystone individuals ( 28 )].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microhabitat structure is another factor known to influence seed predator behavior (Orrock et al, 2004). In general, microhabitats with vegetation cover are thought to provide favorable environments for seed predators at risk of predation from larger predators (Matos & Orrock, 2010; Greenler et al, 2019). Also, variability in timing and frequency of prescribed fire affects the distribution of plant types and seed production (Lashley et al, 2014) and the phenology of fruiting (Lashley et al, 2015) which may contribute to seed depredation risks by influencing seed availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%