2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed burning and mechanical thinning effects on belowground conditions and soil respiration in a mixed-conifer forest, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
41
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(53 reference statements)
4
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Burning, even if it is of light intensity, can increase total nitrogen (Ryu et al, 2009), which supported our observation in nitrogen (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Burning, even if it is of light intensity, can increase total nitrogen (Ryu et al, 2009), which supported our observation in nitrogen (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most post-fire or post-windthrow studies have focused on canopy structure and composition dynamics, historic or natural fire regime, and simulation of the effects of prescribed burning (Abrams 1992;Harper et al 2002;Bergeron et al 2002;Cissel et al 1999;Ryu et al 2006Ryu et al , 2007Ryu et al , 2009. Past investigations generally studied stands long after disturbance, even decades or centuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ms explained 14 % of the high CO 2 flux class (2.11 µmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 ) ( Figure 3A). Similar results were found by Ryu et al (2009) in soils in California (U.S.A.), where Ms explained 14 % of the CO 2 flux variability and showed a negative correlation with CO 2 . Epron et al (2006) also found a negative correlation between CO 2 and Ms in a study on CO 2 fluxes from forest soils in French Guiana.…”
Section: Burned Sugarcanesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on these observations, some studies examined the effects of forest thinning on soil CO 2 efflux with equivocal results ranging from positive effect on soil carbon release [14], negative effect [5,15] and no effect [16][17][18]. Others reported that intensive biomass harvesting may negatively impact carbon stocks in forest soil and vegetation [11], forest thinning did not have a significant impact on carbon stocks or fluxes [19], and remaining residues after harvesting increased carbon storage [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%