2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preschoolers exhibit conformity to computer-simulated food portion selection behaviors of remote peers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, this study also reports exploratory findings concerning the early adolescents' sex and the influence of remote peers on food choices (Kim, Chen, & Cheon, 2019a, 2019bRomero et al, 2009;Sharps & Robinson, 2015. Previous research on school-aged children and young adolescents reported that: (a) girls tended to choose healthier food than boys (Ragelien _ e & Grønhøj, 2020), (b) remote peers had a stronger influence on boys than girls (Giese, Juh asz, Schupp, & Renner, 2013), and (c) there was no interaction of sex and age on food choices (Caine-Bish, & Scheule, 2009;Cooke, & Wardle, 2005;Larson, Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan, Stat, & Story, 2007;Vereecken et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lastly, this study also reports exploratory findings concerning the early adolescents' sex and the influence of remote peers on food choices (Kim, Chen, & Cheon, 2019a, 2019bRomero et al, 2009;Sharps & Robinson, 2015. Previous research on school-aged children and young adolescents reported that: (a) girls tended to choose healthier food than boys (Ragelien _ e & Grønhøj, 2020), (b) remote peers had a stronger influence on boys than girls (Giese, Juh asz, Schupp, & Renner, 2013), and (c) there was no interaction of sex and age on food choices (Caine-Bish, & Scheule, 2009;Cooke, & Wardle, 2005;Larson, Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan, Stat, & Story, 2007;Vereecken et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the sample consisted largely of university students and, therefore, their selected portions may not reflect the average portion sizes of the wider population. Despite this, PSTs in general have been widely used outside of student samples including with children [ 22 , 41 ] and clinical populations [ 42 ]. Finally, the simplified PSTs presented here are developed as proxies for the SCPST and have not been compared with actual ad libitum food intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological advancements that address these potential constraints are computerized or simulated portion selection tasks (PSTs; standard computerized PSTs are referred to as/SCPST throughout) which have been commonly used in research on portion selection, premeal planning and expected satiation/satiety (e.g., [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]). In these tasks, participants can dynamically and flexibly change the portion of food presented on a computer screen using a keyboard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling is based on social learning theory, which posits that children will imitate the behavior of others (Bandura, 1977). In line with the theory, research done in Singapore suggests that preschoolers conform to their peers' portion sizes as well as food and drink preferences (Kim et al, 2019a(Kim et al, , 2019b(Kim et al, , 2020. Moreover, family-style meal service is wellaligned with another key research-backed practice; providing structured mealtime routines (Rollins et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sociality and Commensalitymentioning
confidence: 99%