1993
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preschool child health surveillance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… regular discussion of child health surveillance organization/practice policy (Marsh, Russell & Russell 1989); relevant on‐going training of the primary health care team (Marsh et al 1989; Polnay & Pringle 1989; Goodhart 1991; British Paediatric Association 1992; Gillam & Colver 1993; Glickman et al 1994; Butler et al 1995; Department of Health 1998; Pringle 1999) evidence of audit of child health surveillance within the practice (British Paediatric Association 1992; Butler et al 1995; Department of Health 1998; Pringle 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… regular discussion of child health surveillance organization/practice policy (Marsh, Russell & Russell 1989); relevant on‐going training of the primary health care team (Marsh et al 1989; Polnay & Pringle 1989; Goodhart 1991; British Paediatric Association 1992; Gillam & Colver 1993; Glickman et al 1994; Butler et al 1995; Department of Health 1998; Pringle 1999) evidence of audit of child health surveillance within the practice (British Paediatric Association 1992; Butler et al 1995; Department of Health 1998; Pringle 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relevant on‐going training of the primary health care team (Marsh et al 1989; Polnay & Pringle 1989; Goodhart 1991; British Paediatric Association 1992; Gillam & Colver 1993; Glickman et al 1994; Butler et al 1995; Department of Health 1998; Pringle 1999)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another more desirable way to enhance the inter‐tester agreement would be to increase the training in the use of the test to ensure that potential users are thoroughly familiar with the scoring system, according to the recommendations of Law (1991), Lees & Urwin (1991), Gillam & Colver (1993) and Frankenburg (1994). In light of the results of this study, increased training in the scoring system, would perhaps decrease the percentage of cases for whom the difference in scoring could have meant the difference between referral/ non‐referral, and the accompanying parental anxiety associated with referral, as mentioned by Tymstra (1986) and Holland & Stewart (1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%