Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Eyes After Corneal Refractive Laser Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Sun, Yang; Hong, Yu; Xiao, Rong; Ji, Yinghong

doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.834805

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 59 publications

(71 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various refractive surgeries are used for presbyopia correction, including IOL implantation. Consequently, a number of studies have investigated the effectiveness of various IOLs in addressing presbyopia [ 54 , 55 ] . In addition, a study compared the clinical results of presbyopia-correcting IOLs that combine the extended depth of focus and bifocal profiles with a standard monofocal IOL [ 56 ] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis

Alshammari,

Tarazi,

Aloqaili

et al. 2023

Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The most accurate method of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery has not been determined, and further studies are needed to reach a consensus. The aim of this study was to assess publications related to IOL power calculation formulas, mapping their yearly trends, most productive authors, top publishing countries and institutions, and areas of specialization for IOL power formulas. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of research articles published on the topic of IOL power calculation formulas. Using PubMed, we employed appropriate search terms and filtered the results for the period of January 1, 1946, to June 28, 2023. Data were analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Microsoft Excel programs. The visual representations of the collected data through the use of figures was provided to demonstrate the aspects of IOL power calculation research. Results: We retrieved 5475 documents in the initial search. Analysis of these documents revealed an increase in the number of publications, from one publication in 1946 to 201 publications in 2023. The top three countries contributing to these publications were the United States, China, and Japan, collectively accounting for over 27% of the total articles. However, the two institutions with the highest contributions were located in the United Kingdom and Hungary, neither of which was among the top 10 countries in overall contributions. Overall 15326 authors contributed to publications pertaining to IOL power calculation formulas. Among these authors, the most prolific contributors included Achim Langenbucher from Saarland University (Germany), Giacomo Savini from G.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S. (Italy), and Kenneth J Hoffer from the University of California (United States). Saarland University emerged as the most productive institution, contributing equally to two distinct departments: the Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell Research and Congenital Aniridia, as well as the Department of Experimental Ophthalmology. The School of Physical Science at the Open University in the United Kingdom engaged in partnership with various institutions including Eye & Laser Clinic Castrop Rauxel in Germany and Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria. Among the top 10 keywords found in the publications were “cataract”, “cataract surgery”, and “intraocular lens”. Conclusions: This study represents the first scientometric analysis of publications related to IOL power calculation formulas. The study offers valuable insights into the geographic distribution, contributing authors, and emphasis of research on the IOL power calculation formulas. Further cooperation is essential to pinpoint the most suitable formula and to address gaps in our current understanding.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis

Alshammari,

Tarazi,

Aloqaili

et al. 2023

Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several emerging studies have highlighted the efficacy and safety of multifocal and EDOF IOLs in improving distance, intermediate and near vision, hence spectacle independence, in eyes with previous CRS (including myopic and hyperopic LASIK/PRK) when compared to monofocal IOLs [52,53 ▪ ,54]. A recent meta-analysis of 13 studies showed that presbyopia-correcting IOLs can result in spectacle independence for distance, intermediate and near vision in 98, 99 and 78%, respectively [55 ▪▪ ]. However, visual phenomena such as glare and halo are relatively common in patients who receive presbyopia-correcting IOL (around 30–40%) [55 ▪▪ ].…”

Section: Refractive Target and Spectacles Independencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A recent meta-analysis of 13 studies showed that presbyopia-correcting IOLs can result in spectacle independence for distance, intermediate and near vision in 98, 99 and 78%, respectively [55 ▪▪ ]. However, visual phenomena such as glare and halo are relatively common in patients who receive presbyopia-correcting IOL (around 30–40%) [55 ▪▪ ]. It is also shown that EDOF IOLs may serve as a potential option for achieving spectacle independence in eyes with previous CRS unsuitable for multifocal IOLs [56].…”

Section: Refractive Target and Spectacles Independencementioning

confidence: 99%

Cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery: preoperative considerations and management

Ting,

Gatinel,

Ang

2023

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of review Corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is one of the most popular eye procedures, with more than 40 million cases performed globally. As CRS-treated patients age and develop cataract, the number of cases that require additional preoperative considerations and management will increase around the world. Thus, we provide an up-to-date, concise overview of the considerations and outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with previous CRS, including surface ablation, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Recent findings Challenges associated with accurate biometry in eyes with CRS have been mitigated recently through total keratometry, ray tracing, intraoperative aberrometry, and machine learning assisted intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas to improve prediction. Emerging studies have highlighted the superior performance of ray tracing and/or total keratometry-based formulas for IOL power calculation in eyes with previous SMILE. Dry eye remains a common side effect after cataract surgery, especially in eyes with CRS, though the risk appears to be lower after SMILE than LASIK (in the short-term). Recent presbyopia-correcting IOL designs such as extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs may be suitable in carefully selected eyes with previous CRS. Summary Ophthalmologists will increasingly face challenges associated with the surgical management of cataract in patients with prior CRS. Careful preoperative assessment of the ocular surface, appropriate use of IOL power calculation formulas, and strategies for presbyopia correction are key to achieve good clinical and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction. Recent advances in CRS techniques, such as SMILE, may pose new challenges for such eyes in the future.

show abstract

“…With the advancements in refractive cataract surgery and the widespread adoption of presbyopia-correcting IOLs [ 1 ], patients with cataracts now have a broader range of options available. These options promise to provide spectacle independence across various distances, including far, intermediate, and near vision [ 2 , 3 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction

Wang,

Liu,

Chen

et al. 2024

BMC Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To evaluate the objective visual outcomes following implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) in individuals with varying axial lengths (AL) and targeted refraction. Methods This retrospective study comprised age-matched eyes that underwent implantation of the EDOF IOL. Eyes were categorized based on AL into groups: control group with AL < 26 mm; high myopia group with AL ≥ 26 mm. Each group was then subdivided based on postoperative spherical equivalent (SE). Follow-up at three months included assessment of uncorrected visual acuity at different distances, contrast sensitivity (CS), refractive outcomes, and spectacle independence. Results Overall, this study included 100 eyes from 100 patients, comprising 50 males (50.00%) and 50 females (50.00%), with 20 eyes in each group. In the control group, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 5 and 3 m (m) in the − 1.50 to -0.75 group was inferior to that of the − 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.004). Conversely, the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 33 cm in the − 1.50 to -0.75 group was superior to that of the − 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.005). Within the high myopia group, the UDVA at 5 and 3 m in the − 2.25 to -1.50 group was worse than in the − 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.009 and 0.008, respectively). However, the UNVA at 33 cm in the − 2.25 to -1.50 group was better than in the − 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed among the groups for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P > 0.05). Additionally, in the high myopia group, the CS of the − 2.25 to -1.50 group was lower compared to that of the − 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.017). Among high myopia patients, 90.00% with refraction ranging from − 1.50 to -0.75 reported achieving overall spectacle independence. Conclusions Implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses (IOLs) yields satisfactory visual and refractive outcomes in eyes with axial myopia. Among high myopia patients, a refraction ranging from − 1.50 to -0.75 diopters achieves superior visual quality compared to other postoperative myopic diopters.

show abstract

Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Eyes After Corneal Refractive Laser Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Cited by 7 publications

References 59 publications

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis

Cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery: preoperative considerations and management

Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About