Prepublication data sharing

Birney, Ewan; Hudson, Thomas J.; Green, Douglas R.; Gunter, Chris; Eddy, Sean R.; Rogers, Jane; Harris, Rachel; Ehrlich, S. Dusko; Apweiler, Rolf; Austin, Christopher P.; Berglund, Lisa; Bobrow, Martin; Bountra, C.; Brookes, Anthony J.; Cambon‐Thomsen, Anne; Carter, N P; Chisholm, Rex L.; Contreras, Jorge L.; Cooke, Rachel; Crosby, William L.; Dewar, Ken; Durbin, Richard; Som., Dyke; Ecker,; Emam, Khaled El; Feuk, Lars; Gabriel, Stacey; Jej., Gallacher; Gelbart, William M.; Granell, A; Guarner, Francisco; Hubbard, Tim; Jackson, S A; Jennings, Jennifer L.; Joly, Yann; Jones, Stephanie; Kaye, Jane; Kennedy, K L; Knoppers, Bartha Maria; Kyrpides, Nikos; Lowrance, William W.; Luo, Jianxun; Mackay, J. Ross; Martín-Rivera, L; McCombie, W. Richard; Mcpherson, John Douglas; Miller, Lindsay M.; Miller, Wolfgang J.; Moerman, Daniel E.; Mooser, Vincent; Morton, Caroline; Ostell, James; Ouellette, B. F. Francis; Parkhill, J; Raina, Parminder; Rawlings, Christopher J.; Scherer, Steven E.; Scherer, Stephen W.; Schofield, Paul N.; Sensen, Christoph Wilhelm; Stodden, Victoria; Sussman, Maya; Tanaka, Toshio; Thornton, Janet M.; Tsunoda, Tatsuhiko; Valle, David; Vuorio, Eero; Walker, Neil M.; Wallace, Susan; Weinstock, George M.; Whitman, William B.; Worley, Kim C.; Wu, Chun; Wu, Jia Qian; Yu, Jun

doi:10.1038/461168a

Cited by 233 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

123

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, ensure that the process remains driven by rigorous and solid scientific judgment and encourage continual discussions regarding the direction and long-term goal of the project. Third, publicly release data and technical resources rapidly, prior to publication, to the entire scientific community, given that quick transmission of information promotes the best interests of science and the general public [6, 13]. Fourth, encourage innovation and facilitate open discussions with technology developers to create new instrumentation and approaches that can have wide-ranging impact on the broader scientific community while also benefiting the general public.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building dialogues between clinical and biomedical research through cross-species collaborations

Chao

Liu

Bellen

2017

Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today, biomedical science is equipped with an impressive array of technologies and genetic resources that bolster our basic understanding of fundamental biology and enhance the practice of modern medicine by providing clinicians with a diverse toolkit to diagnose, prognosticate, and treat a plethora of conditions. Many significant advances in our understanding of disease mechanisms and therapeutic interventions have arisen from fruitful dialogues between clinicians and biomedical research scientists. However, the increasingly specialized scientific and medical disciplines, globalization of science and technology, and complex datasets often hinder the development of effective interdisciplinary collaborations between clinical medicine and biomedical research. The goal of this review is to provide examples of diverse strategies to enhance communication and collaboration across diverse disciplines. First, we discuss examples of efforts to foster interdisciplinary collaborations at institutional and multi-institutional levels. Second, we explore resources and tools for clinicians and research scientists to facilitate effective bi-directional dialogues. Third, we use our experiences in neurobiology and human genetics to highlight how communication between clinical medicine and biomedical research lead to effective implementation of cross-species model organism approaches to uncover the biological underpinnings of health and disease.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building dialogues between clinical and biomedical research through cross-species collaborations

Chao

Liu

Bellen

2017

Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The resulting “Bermuda principles” (34) state that data should be publicly released prior to publication, within 24 hours of generation. Similar principles have since been adopted by other publicly funded ’omics initiatives, including structural genomics (35).…”

Section: Eliminating the Disclosure Disparitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Shining Light into Black Boxes

Morin

Urban

Adams

et al. 2012

Science

169

142

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, fungal systematists typically deposit sequences into GenBank only after their analyses have been accepted for publication, but publicly financed genome centers have an obligation to make genome sequences available almost immediately upon completion (the waiting period for public genome release upon completion at genome centers such as JGI and the Broad Institute is 1 mo). Current community standards for data access are based on the Fort Lauderdale (Anonymous 2003) and Toronto (Birney 2009) agreements, which emphasized the shared responsibilities among data producers, researchers, supporting agencies, and editors and reviewers to ensure rapid release and fair use of data. A central message is that communication is crucial.…”

Section: Achieving Genome-enabled Mycologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward genome-enabled mycology

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genome-enabled mycology is a rapidly expanding field that is characterized by the pervasive use of genome-scale data and associated computational tools in all aspects of fungal biology. Genomeenabled mycology is integrative and often requires teams of researchers with diverse skills in organismal mycology, bioinformatics and molecular biology. This issue of Mycologia presents the first complete fungal genomes in the history of the journal, reflecting the ongoing transformation of mycology into a genomeenabled science. Here, we consider the prospects for genome-enabled mycology and the technical and social challenges that will need to be overcome to grow the database of complete fungal genomes and enable all fungal biologists to make use of the new data.

show abstract

Prepublication data sharing

Cited by 233 publications

References 5 publications

Building dialogues between clinical and biomedical research through cross-species collaborations

Building dialogues between clinical and biomedical research through cross-species collaborations

Shining Light into Black Boxes

Toward genome-enabled mycology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About