2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8237-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preprocessing of Skin Cancer Using Anisotropic Diffusion and Sigmoid Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These works are participated in task‐1 of ISIC‐2017 challenges, the drawbacks of these approaches are presented in the literature. The proposed method also compared with the non‐participated and published work of skin cancer segmentation methods such as PSPNet (Pacheco et al, 2019), DTL (Rahmat et al, 2016) and U‐Net (Sau et al, 2018). Compared to all these works, the proposed FrCN segmentation obtained the best segmentation results because initially hair and noise is removed from the skin lesions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These works are participated in task‐1 of ISIC‐2017 challenges, the drawbacks of these approaches are presented in the literature. The proposed method also compared with the non‐participated and published work of skin cancer segmentation methods such as PSPNet (Pacheco et al, 2019), DTL (Rahmat et al, 2016) and U‐Net (Sau et al, 2018). Compared to all these works, the proposed FrCN segmentation obtained the best segmentation results because initially hair and noise is removed from the skin lesions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was suffered with the improper classification and segmentation issues due to inaccurate and improper hair removal operation. In (Sau et al, 2018) authors used the contrast adjustment, normalization, anisotropic diffusion filter (ADF) along with calculation of gradient thresholding parameter through sigmoid function. The method was unable to remove the hair content due to over enhancements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors developed a unique meta-heuristic method called the DHOA-NN algorithm in reference to the work they did in [17]. The minute movements made by the buck are quickly detected, and the visual capacity of a buck is five times greater than that of a person, both of which contribute to the difficulty of the hunting process [18].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, quality of the rebuilt lesion is improved due to the removal of hair, thus the system records the best performance. [11], CUOI [13], HI [14], FGF-CEF [15], BHF [16], ADF [17], and TL-CNN [18].…”
Section: Performance Hair Removal and Filtering Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the inadequacies in hair removal, the categorization and segmentation of this procedure were faulty. Gradient Thresholding Parameter was calculated using an anisotropic diffusion filter (ADF) with normalization and contrast adjustment properties, as well as a sigmoid function, as described in [17]. Because to over-enhancements, the method was unable to completely eradicate hair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%