2015
DOI: 10.1109/access.2015.2431493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preprocessing and Feature Selection for Improved Sensor Interoperability in Online Biometric Signature Verification

Abstract: Due to the technological evolution and the increasing popularity of smartphones, people can access an application using authentication based on biometric approaches from many different devices. Device interoperability is a very challenging problem for biometrics, which needs to be further studied. In this paper, we focus on interoperability device compensation for online signature verification since this biometric trait is gaining a significant interest in banking and commercial sector in the last years. The p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, some important conclusions can be extracted comparing the results obtained in this work to the results obtained in previous work [6]. The high technological evolution and the improvement of sensor quality together with our proposed approach for dealing with device interoperability lead to very competitive signature verification systems based on finger input over COTS smartphones.…”
Section: E-biosign Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Finally, some important conclusions can be extracted comparing the results obtained in this work to the results obtained in previous work [6]. The high technological evolution and the improvement of sensor quality together with our proposed approach for dealing with device interoperability lead to very competitive signature verification systems based on finger input over COTS smartphones.…”
Section: E-biosign Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This stage is similar than the proposed in previous works [2]. Several statistical data normalization techniques have been studied in order to compensate for geometric differences between devices.…”
Section: A Data Preprocessing Stagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…While signatures from a genuine user differ significantly (high intra-class variability), skilled forgeries could be similar to genuine signatures (low interclass variability). Together with this intrinsic variability of signatures, there are sources of extrinsic variability such as the device interoperability scenario which affect significantly the performance of the system as it can be seen in recent works [2]. Therefore, it is important to take into account this new device interoperability scenario due to the high deployment of devices such as smartphones and tablets and their increasing popularity in our society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While developing the MFA system, biometrics independence should be considered carefully, i.e., assurance of interoperability criteria should be met [170]. The framework needs to have functionality to handle the biometric data from sensors other than the initially deployed ones [171].…”
Section: Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%