2020
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preprocessing, analysis and quantification in single‐voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts' consensus recommendations

Abstract: Once an MRS dataset has been acquired, several important steps must be taken to obtain the desired metabolite concentration measures. First, the data must be preprocessed to prepare them for analysis. Next, the intensity of the metabolite signal(s) of interest must be estimated. Finally, the measured metabolite signal intensities must be converted into scaled concentration units employing a quantitative reference signal to allow meaningful interpretation. In this paper, we review these three main steps in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
402
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(232 reference statements)
5
402
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Localized 1 H‐MR spectra were acquired with a localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence (echo time = 15 milliseconds, repetition time = 5 seconds, 256 averages) 48 as described previously 44,45 . Spectra were saved as single scans, which were frequency and phase corrected 49 . Frequency drifts were corrected in the time domain after peak picking in frequency domain (the total creatine peak at 3 ppm) by using the first transient as reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Localized 1 H‐MR spectra were acquired with a localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence (echo time = 15 milliseconds, repetition time = 5 seconds, 256 averages) 48 as described previously 44,45 . Spectra were saved as single scans, which were frequency and phase corrected 49 . Frequency drifts were corrected in the time domain after peak picking in frequency domain (the total creatine peak at 3 ppm) by using the first transient as reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, phase correction was done in the time domain by calculating the phase difference between the reference (first) transient and other transients. Transients that showed evidence for motion (substantial deviations in frequency, line width, signal‐to‐noise ratio, loss of water suppression efficiency relative to other transients) were excluded prior to averaging 49 . In the 23 spectra obtained from the Q84/Q84 cohort (mice that were included in the MRS analysis), 1 to 2 shots (of 256) were excluded in 3 spectra, 45 shots were excluded in 1 spectrum, and the acquisition had to be stopped because of gasping in 1 mouse, generating 110 usable shots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectra were acquired with the stimulated echo acquisition mode [51] sequence (TE = 6.0 ms, TR = 5.0 s, 64 averages). Outcome measures for MRS were concentration ratios of glutamate, GABA, NAA, and mI, to total Creatine (tCr, Creatine + Phospho-Creatine), because using tCr as the internal reference inherently corrects for variabilities caused by transmit or receive RF inhomogeneity, magnetic field drift, and CSF inclusion in the voxel [52].…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report quantified MM-supp GABA in molal units, accounting for tissue specific relaxation and mole fractions of water as per standard MRS quantification approaches 23 . As secondary and follow-up analyses, we report MM-supp GABA including the "α-correction" 22 , which accounts for the higher concentration of GABA in grey matter (GM) compared to white matter (WM) (α = 0.5, which assumes the concentration of GABA in GM Statistical analysis.…”
Section: Mri Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%