2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep41530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein Predicts Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction a systematic meta-analysis

Abstract: Risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is critical in order to provide adequate treatment. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess the predictive role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We included 7 studies, out of 1,033 studies, with a total of 6,993 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, which were divided in the high or low CRP group, according… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the key factors influencing ISR are important for clinical treatment and prognosis. Recent studies have shown that laboratory serological parameters, such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) level,5 neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio6 and average blood platelet volume,7 can predict the occurrence of stent restenosis. There are multiple other factors, such as vascular damage caused by stent placement, local and systemic inflammatory responses induced by stent implantation and of coronary lesion severity, that may also affect stent restenosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the key factors influencing ISR are important for clinical treatment and prognosis. Recent studies have shown that laboratory serological parameters, such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) level,5 neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio6 and average blood platelet volume,7 can predict the occurrence of stent restenosis. There are multiple other factors, such as vascular damage caused by stent placement, local and systemic inflammatory responses induced by stent implantation and of coronary lesion severity, that may also affect stent restenosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in the other CV interventions, high‐baseline CRP levels have been suggested to be associated with poor postinterventional outcomes. A meta‐analysis by Mincu et al 5 of seven studies enrolling a total of 6993 patients undergoing primary PCI for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) found that high‐baseline CRP levels predicted increased in‐hospital target vessel revascularization, in‐hospital/follow‐up mortality, in‐hospital/follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and recurrent MI. Also, in a meta‐analysis by Li et al 8 of 15 studies including a total of 3110 patients undergoing CABG, high‐baseline CRP levels were associated with increased postoperative atrial fibrillation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels play an important role in predicting prognoses of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (stable coronary artery disease, 1 acute coronary syndrome, 2,3 and peripheral artery disease 4 ) and outcomes after cardiovascular (CV) interventions (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], 5‐7 coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], 8 and vascular surgery 9 ). Several biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptides, troponins, galectin‐3, growth differentiation factor‐15, and microRNAs) have been known to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was performed as previously described, [8][9][10] complying with the 'Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions', 11 and the 'Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)' reporting guidelines. The analysis was performed as previously described, [8][9][10] complying with the 'Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions', 11 and the 'Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)' reporting guidelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%