Background:The historic, cultural separation of primary care and behavioral health has caused the spread of integrated care to lag behind other practice transformation efforts. The Advancing Care Together study was a 3-year evaluation of how practices implemented integrated care in their local contexts; at its culmination, practice leaders ("innovators") identified lessons learned to pass on to others.Methods: Individual feedback from innovators, key messages created by workgroups of innovators and the study team, and a synthesis of key messages from a facilitated discussion were analyzed for themes via immersion/crystallization.Results: Five key themes were captured: (1) frame integrated care as a necessary paradigm shift to patient-centered, whole-person health care; (2) initialize: define relationships and protocols up-front, understanding they will evolve; (3) build inclusive, empowered teams to provide the foundation for integration; (4) Of adults with a behavioral health (BH) disorder, 67% do not receive adequate treatment.1 Untreated BH conditions result in avoidable suffering and increase the cost of care through lack of medical improvement, decreased adherence to treatment, and inappropriate health care utilization.
2Most patients with BH conditions, including children, are seen in medical settings, most commonly primary care (PC), presenting the need and opportunity to replace separated systems of care that do not adequately meet the needs of patients with integrated, "whole-person" care.Integrated behavioral health (or integrated care) is the care that results from a practice team of PC and BH clinicians working together with patients and families, using a systematic and cost-effective approach to provide patient-centered care for a defined population. This care may address mental health, substance use conditions, health behaviors (including their contribution to chronic medical illnesses), life stressors and crises, stress-related physical symptoms, and ineffective patterns of health care utilization. The historic, cultural separation of training, payment, and delivery systems for PC and BH have caused the spread of integrated care to lag far behind other practice transformation efforts (eg, the Patient Centered Medical Home [PCMH]). New payment structures and delivery models that support the integration of PC and BH are emerging, facilitating the movement toward integrated care as part of the drive to achieve the This article was externally peer reviewed.