2010
DOI: 10.1080/10665684.2010.510048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing Teachers for Diversity: Examination of Teacher Certification and Program Accreditation Standards in the 50 States and Washington, DC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Policies such as state teacher certification and accreditation requirements are presented as impartial and neutral, applied to all individuals equally without regard to race or other demographic identities, and based on notions of teacher quality. Although all states speak to "diversity" in their accreditation standards, in most states, the diversity requirements are ambiguous (Akiba, Cockrell, Simmons, Han, & Agarwal, 2010). Color-blind conceptions of quality teaching, by failing to account for ways race matters in education, support the continued Whiteness of teacher education.…”
Section: Challenge To Claims Of Neutrality Color Blindness and Merimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies such as state teacher certification and accreditation requirements are presented as impartial and neutral, applied to all individuals equally without regard to race or other demographic identities, and based on notions of teacher quality. Although all states speak to "diversity" in their accreditation standards, in most states, the diversity requirements are ambiguous (Akiba, Cockrell, Simmons, Han, & Agarwal, 2010). Color-blind conceptions of quality teaching, by failing to account for ways race matters in education, support the continued Whiteness of teacher education.…”
Section: Challenge To Claims Of Neutrality Color Blindness and Merimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1979, the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education has included multiculturalism in the standards required for TEPs seeking accreditation. Nonetheless, Akiba, Cockrell, Simmons, Han, and Agarwal's () content analysis of state standards related to diversity and multiculturalism reveals that accreditation requirements and the phrasing of diversity‐related standards are ambiguous and lack specific requirements—leaving great room for interpretation and, perhaps, the impression that a brief introduction to multicultural education is sufficient. In essence, while some form of multicultural attention is mandated for accredited TEPs, future research is necessary to assess what they entail and how in‐depth, effective, and prevalent they are on a national level.…”
Section: Multicultural Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gap between existing teaching methods for social class diversity and the use of these methods in schools also indicates failures in public policy. Currently, all states include diversity training in their educational standards, but the required diversity training for teachers varies, and many states have vague diversity requirements (Akiba, Cockrell, Simmons, Seunghee, & Agarwal, ). Policy on the district, state, and national levels should have specific requirements for teacher training in social class diversity.…”
Section: How Public Policy Can Do Bettermentioning
confidence: 99%