Preparing Physicians for Rural Practice: Availability of Rural Training in Rural-Centric Residency Programs

Abstract

Background Exposing residents to rural training encourages future rural practice, but unified accreditation of allopathic and osteopathic graduate medical education under one system by 2020 has uncertain implications for rural residency programs. Objective We describe training locations and rural-specific content of rural-centric residency programs (requiring at least 8 weeks of rurally located training) before this transition. Methods In 2015, we surveyed residency programs that were rurally located or had rural tracks in 7 specialties and classified training locations as rural or urban using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. Results Of 1849 residencies in anesthesiology, emergency medicine, general surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry, 119 (6%) were rurally located or offered a rural track. Ninety-seven programs (82%) responded to the survey. Thirty-six programs required at least 8 weeks of rural training for some or all residents, and 69% of these rural-centric residencies were urban-based and 53% were osteopathic. Locations were rural for 26% of hospital rotations and 28% of continuity clinics. Many rural-centric programs (35%) reported only urban ZIP codes for required rural block rotations; 54% reported only urban ZIP codes for required rural clinic sessions, and 31% listed only urban ZIP codes in reporting rural full-time training locations. Programs varied widely in coverage of rural-specific training in 6 core competencies. Conclusions In multiple specialties important for rural health care systems, little rurally located residency training and rural-specific content was available. Substantial proportions of training locations reported to be rural were actually urban according to a common rural definition.

Local Capacity for Emergency Births in Rural Hospitals Without Obstetrics Services

“…Only a few rural obstetric medical residency programs exist in the United States, but these exist alongside a greater number of area/regional health education consortiums and rural family practice residencies. These types of programs may expand academic‐clinical partnerships with rural and referral hospitals in order to develop regional standards and locally relevant mentorships, training, and support networks to address training needs identified in this study 17,22,23 …”

Faculties to Support General Practitioners Working Rurally at Broader Scope: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Their Value

“…Table 1 summarizes the reasoning for each faculty’s emergence, both of which are equivalent for Australian Medical Council accreditation purposes. However, despite their potential value, evidence about rural faculties remains largely descriptive with limited evaluation of their workforce outcomes against mainstream approaches [ 7 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], including limited evidence from small scale rural residencies in other countries and other more localized postgraduate workforce interventions [ 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”

Rural Michigan Farmers’ Health Concerns and Experiences: A Focus Group Study

“…Such strategies include expanding providers' scope and clinical autonomy to entice rural community practice and targeting medical school admissions for students with rural upbringing or an interest in rural practice. [20][21][22][23][24] Other novel strategies show promise in improving access to care in rural agricultural settings. In 1 study, a novel partnership between primary care practices and emergency departments successfully identified social health needs and rendered requisite support by optimizing emergency care, providing emergent acute care, and addressing rural social determinants of health for patients as well as reducing competition for resources and achieving financial solvency for rural health care facilities.…”