2016
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing Laboratory and Real-World EEG Data for Large-Scale Analysis: A Containerized Approach

Abstract: Large-scale analysis of EEG and other physiological measures promises new insights into brain processes and more accurate and robust brain–computer interface models. However, the absence of standardized vocabularies for annotating events in a machine understandable manner, the welter of collection-specific data organizations, the difficulty in moving data across processing platforms, and the unavailability of agreed-upon standards for preprocessing have prevented large-scale analyses of EEG. Here we describe a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BIDS reflects a systematic way to organize data in a folder structure with dedicated names. An alternative standard to EEG BIDS following the same goal of enabling data sharing is the EEG Study Schema (ESS) (Bigdely-Shamlo et al, 2016) . We have decided to implement BIDS EEG (instead of the ESS) because the BIDS EEG can be readily combined to other BIDS extensions such as an extension for eye tracking, or fMRI that all follow the same basic structure.…”
Section: Bids Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BIDS reflects a systematic way to organize data in a folder structure with dedicated names. An alternative standard to EEG BIDS following the same goal of enabling data sharing is the EEG Study Schema (ESS) (Bigdely-Shamlo et al, 2016) . We have decided to implement BIDS EEG (instead of the ESS) because the BIDS EEG can be readily combined to other BIDS extensions such as an extension for eye tracking, or fMRI that all follow the same basic structure.…”
Section: Bids Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used several open-source tools that we have developed to do the automated preprocessing. To facilitate preprocessing we organized each study by placing it in a containerized format using the EEG Study Schema (ESS) as described in Bigdely-Shamlo et al (Bigdely-Shamlo et al, 2016b). ESS, which is part of the BigEEG technology stack (BigEEG Workflow, 2018), allows specification, in machine-readable format, of channel labels and locations as well as meta-data such as subject and task information about each recording.…”
Section: Data Organization and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, we have tagged millions of events across 1860 datasets from 22 EEG studies. We are also in the process of converting the publicly available HED 1.0 annotated datasets from headit.org to HED 2.0 and ESS 2.0 (Bigdely-Shamlo et al, 2016 ). Figure 3 shows a visual representation of the relative numbers of occurrences of events in several major categories.…”
Section: Annotation Use Cases and Supporting Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we introduce HED 2.0, a considerable extension of the HED 1.0 system to allow descriptions of the much larger range of events of interest contained in real and virtual world EEG experiments. HED 2.0, combined with our proposed EEG Study Schema (ESS) and containerization tools (Bigdely-Shamlo et al, 2016 ), create a tool and standards ecosystem that make it possible to store and interrogate data in a large or small collection of similar or diverse EEG studies. The goal of the HED/ESS system is to allow researchers to obtain new information about brain dynamics supporting human experience and behavior not easily obtainable from any one experiment by exploiting information still buried in the accumulating stores of carefully collected EEG and related data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%