2009
DOI: 10.1353/sof.0.0159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing for Public Life: School Sector and the Educational Context of Lasting Citizen Formation

Abstract: School sector and educational context seem to make a difference in civic socialization. There is limited knowledge, however, of the mechanisms through which socialization may occur in public and private schools, and the extent to which they have any lasting effect. Does the private school effect on civic socialization persist into young adulthood, and if it does, what explains the effect? Analyzing data from NELS:88 using HLM, the results of this study show that, net of background controls, there is a private … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through a commitment to a common curriculum and educational opportunity for all students, these "communal organizations" (Bryk, Lee, & Holland, 1993) have an educational advantage for the disadvantaged (Bryk, Lee, & Holland, 1993;Coleman, Hoffer, & Kilgore, 1982;Greeley, 2002). In addition, an effective authority, a strong sense of collective identity, and the personalism of religious school communities may have advantages for civic education (Campbell, 2001;Dill, 2009;Godwin, Ausbrooks, & Martinez, 2001;Godwin, Godwin, & Martinez-Ebers, 2004;Sikkink, 2004Sikkink, , 2009Wolf, Greene, Kleitz, & Thalhammer, 2001;Wolf, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a commitment to a common curriculum and educational opportunity for all students, these "communal organizations" (Bryk, Lee, & Holland, 1993) have an educational advantage for the disadvantaged (Bryk, Lee, & Holland, 1993;Coleman, Hoffer, & Kilgore, 1982;Greeley, 2002). In addition, an effective authority, a strong sense of collective identity, and the personalism of religious school communities may have advantages for civic education (Campbell, 2001;Dill, 2009;Godwin, Ausbrooks, & Martinez, 2001;Godwin, Godwin, & Martinez-Ebers, 2004;Sikkink, 2004Sikkink, , 2009Wolf, Greene, Kleitz, & Thalhammer, 2001;Wolf, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there a few strong studies of the impact of various types of schools on civic engagement and religiosity (Campbell, 2001;Dill, 2009;Godwin, Godwin, & Martinez-Ebers, 2004;Uecker, 2008Uecker, , 2009), most of the existing studies are limited to rough comparisons of Catholic and "non-Catholic religious" sectors (Jeynes, 2003;Wolf, 2007). Even the seminal work of Coleman and Hoffer (1987) and Bryk, Lee, and Holland (1993) were largely limited to comparisons of Catholic and public school effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These norms frequently contain goals outlining requirements for service learning, social justice, and altruism, justifying inclusion of activism education aligned with these goals. The literature suggests that elite private school students frequently enact pro-social behaviors, such as engagement in political debate and voluntary community service (Dill 2009). Some authors, however, caution that these behaviors represent examples of noblesse oblige (e g., Dunne and Edwards 2010).…”
Section: Private Schools and Activismmentioning
confidence: 99%