2002
DOI: 10.1080/0969594022000001940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing for National Monitoring in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1999 educational reform was one of the four reforms-social security, healthcare, public administration, and education-implemented by the government elected in 1997. The three main goals of the education reform were to increase the level of education in society, provide equal educational opportunities to everyone, and improve the quality of education (Bialecki et al 2002). While the other three reforms were implemented simultaneously, they similarly affected all students and all adults in the population.…”
Section: The Educational Reform Of 1999 In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1999 educational reform was one of the four reforms-social security, healthcare, public administration, and education-implemented by the government elected in 1997. The three main goals of the education reform were to increase the level of education in society, provide equal educational opportunities to everyone, and improve the quality of education (Bialecki et al 2002). While the other three reforms were implemented simultaneously, they similarly affected all students and all adults in the population.…”
Section: The Educational Reform Of 1999 In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caution should be taken in interpreting results due to the "often narrow focus of comparative data and the consequential risk of misinterpretation" (Tamassia and Adams, 2009). The use of an international framework limits the ability of international assessments to give a comprehensive overview of any one national system (Bialecki et al, 2002;Ofqual, 2008). Finally, the international assessment cycle may not come at optimum times to monitor extensive system reform or innovation (Green and Oates, 2009;Ofqual, 2008).…”
Section: European Commissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caution should be taken in interpreting results due to the "often narrow focus of comparative data and the consequential risk of misinterpretation" (Tamassia and Adams, 2009). The use of an international framework limits the ability of international assessments to give a comprehensive overview of any one national system (Bialecki et al, 2002;Ofqual, 2008). Finally, the international assessment cycle may not come at optimum times to monitor extensive system reform or innovation (Green and Oates, 2009;Ofqual, 2008).…”
Section: International Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%