2011
DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2010.532865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing ‘educational’ leaders in managerialist times: an Australian story

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this practice is also occurring in other countries such as Australia and the UK (Quiggin 2001;Fanghanel 2007;Nagy and Burch 2009;Simmons 2010;Eacott 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this practice is also occurring in other countries such as Australia and the UK (Quiggin 2001;Fanghanel 2007;Nagy and Burch 2009;Simmons 2010;Eacott 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While I see some merit in this line of argument -the critique of managerialist/neoliberal discourses -and have myself done this in the past (see Eacott, 2011aEacott, , 2011bEacott, , 2011c, in this book I am providing a more productive way of researching school leadership. This is not to suggest anything inappropriate, just that it is impossible to provide further commentary on these instruments.…”
Section: Dinham's Aesopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This establishes, and sustains, a particular relationship between the concept of "leadership" and the empirical space in which practice takes place, one where the location of practice in both time and space is 93 "Leadership" and the social acknowledged, yet under-theorised. With the expansion of what Gunter (1997) originally labelled the "educational management industry", which could now be more appropriately categorised as the educational leadership industry, and the proliferation of school leadership preparation and development programmes outside of the academy (see Eacott, 2011), there is now, more than ever, a need to engage with the knowledge claims of "leadership" in the educational administration discourse.…”
Section: Ijem 271mentioning
confidence: 99%