2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparatory Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Improved Valve Sizing

Abstract: Preparatory balloon aortic valvuloplasty during transcatheter aortic valve implantation improves valve size selection, reduces the associated PAR, and increases survival in borderline cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
34
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The implanted CoreValve stent size (26 or 29 mm, 31 mm) seems to be an independent predictor of severe PVR. It is tempting to speculate that potential inaccuracies in the preprocedural measurement of the annulus diameter, using cardiac CT or transesophageal echocardiography, lead to inappropriate stent size selection and subsequent postprocedural PVR . Although we observed a significantly higher degree of PVR in subjects who received a 29 mm prosthesis (n = 50) compared to those who received a 26 mm prosthesis (n = 44), we did not find a significant difference in the small subgroup (n = 6) of patients who received a 31 mm prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implanted CoreValve stent size (26 or 29 mm, 31 mm) seems to be an independent predictor of severe PVR. It is tempting to speculate that potential inaccuracies in the preprocedural measurement of the annulus diameter, using cardiac CT or transesophageal echocardiography, lead to inappropriate stent size selection and subsequent postprocedural PVR . Although we observed a significantly higher degree of PVR in subjects who received a 29 mm prosthesis (n = 50) compared to those who received a 26 mm prosthesis (n = 44), we did not find a significant difference in the small subgroup (n = 6) of patients who received a 31 mm prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In the light of these findings, first, choice of CoreValve should be considered with caution if the evaluated parameters predict a high likelihood of severe PVR. If 1 of the 3 parameters (see above) would estimate postprocedural severe PVR, the physicians should consider a different aortic valve replacement device, that is, Edwards Lifescience SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve System, or consider open heart surgery …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Theoretically, it could help with ensuring easy passage of the new valve through the old one and allow better deployment with reduced paravalvular leak, as well as help in sizing of the valve. 5 However, the necessity of BAV is unknown and currently sizing is predominantly done using 3D computerized tomography or even 3D transesophageal echocardiography. 6,7 Conversely, avoiding the BAV could theoretically reduce time taken for the procedure, reduce ionizing radiation exposure, and reduce the number of cerebral emboli that are known to occur during the BAV procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, BAV is thought to promote adequate apposition of the THV stent to the annulus with optimal stent expansion and good functional results without paravalvular leakage (PVL). Furthermore, BAV has been advocated to predict displacement of coronary leaflets during TAVI or as a sizing tool [8] even though multi-slice contrast-enhanced computed tomography is increasingly being recognized as the planning modality of choice [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%