2011
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2011.2863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation, recognition characteristics and properties for quercetin molecularly imprinted polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental reason for the difference in adsorption capacity between static and dynamic tests is whether the adsorbate can effectively overcome the mass transfer resistance of the liquid film on the surface of adsorbent to reach the same adsorption equilibrium in a certain time. AM was also widely used as a functional monomer to prepare KA‐MIPs and QU‐MIPs 23,26,28 . Although MAA was used to prepare KA‐MIPs and QU‐MIPs in other work, the present work showed that MAA was not suitable for KA‐MIPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The fundamental reason for the difference in adsorption capacity between static and dynamic tests is whether the adsorbate can effectively overcome the mass transfer resistance of the liquid film on the surface of adsorbent to reach the same adsorption equilibrium in a certain time. AM was also widely used as a functional monomer to prepare KA‐MIPs and QU‐MIPs 23,26,28 . Although MAA was used to prepare KA‐MIPs and QU‐MIPs in other work, the present work showed that MAA was not suitable for KA‐MIPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The four -OH groups participate in the formation of bonds in the polymer cavities. Isotherms of quercetin adsorption for such a system have been presented by Yu et al [14]. As reported, the adsorption capacity increased from 267 to 1080 ng/g when the initial concentration of quercetin was increased from 2 to 14 mg/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The analyte-monomer complex is then subjected to polymerization initiated by temperature or irradiation (thermal or photoinitiation) during which in the presence of a cross-linking agent, a three-dimensional polymer structure is formed. At the subsequent stage, the template is removed from the polymer structure obtained, leaving empty cavities capable of binding the template molecules as they are complementary to these template molecules in size, shape and functional group positions [12,13,14]. The final properties of polymer scavengers depend on a number of parameters, including the types of monomers chosen, type of their interactions with the template, quantitative ratio of the monomer to the template, conditions of polymerization and the way of removing the template from the polymer ( Soxhlet extraction, dialysis, thermal desorption ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During polymerization, two types of binding sites are formed: the first is a complete interaction between the functional monomer and the template, which is supposed to be a specific binding site of the MIP, and the second is a free functional monomer in the polymer matrix that causes non-specific binding [67]. In contrast to MIPs, a Scatchard plot derived from NIPs (Supplementary Figure S5) providing a small correlation derived from the NIP equation indicates that cotinine can be adsorbed on the surface of control polymers by nonselective interaction, including van der Waals force, although NIPs do not contain imprinting sites [68].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%