2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-08387-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation, properties, and photocatalytic mechanism of In2.77S4/BiVO4 heterostructure for tetracycline degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the local enlarged high-resolution TEM detected the lattice fringes of In 2.77 S 4 and In­(OH) 3 , confirming the formation of a In 2.77 S 4 /In­(OH) 3 heterojunction (Figure e). The d -spacing of In 2.77 S 4 /In­(OH) 3 is analyzed by the fast Fourier transform, and a lattice spacing of 0.280 nm is related to the (220) crystal plane of cubic In­(OH) 3 , and a d -spacing of 0.619 nm is a response to the (111) plane of In 2.77 S 4 . , The TEM images of In 2.77 S 4 /In­(OH) 3 /P indicate small nanosheets are wrapped around a larger size nanosheet with a similarly morphology (Figure f). Interestingly, we found the lattice spacing corresponding to the (111) plane of In 2.77 S 4 increases after P doping (0.702 nm), and the lattice spacing of the (220) plane of In­(OH) 3 is 0.280 nm (Figure g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the local enlarged high-resolution TEM detected the lattice fringes of In 2.77 S 4 and In­(OH) 3 , confirming the formation of a In 2.77 S 4 /In­(OH) 3 heterojunction (Figure e). The d -spacing of In 2.77 S 4 /In­(OH) 3 is analyzed by the fast Fourier transform, and a lattice spacing of 0.280 nm is related to the (220) crystal plane of cubic In­(OH) 3 , and a d -spacing of 0.619 nm is a response to the (111) plane of In 2.77 S 4 . , The TEM images of In 2.77 S 4 /In­(OH) 3 /P indicate small nanosheets are wrapped around a larger size nanosheet with a similarly morphology (Figure f). Interestingly, we found the lattice spacing corresponding to the (111) plane of In 2.77 S 4 increases after P doping (0.702 nm), and the lattice spacing of the (220) plane of In­(OH) 3 is 0.280 nm (Figure g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the size of the arc diameter indicates the efficiency of the charge-transfer process at the electrode interface. The larger the arc diameter, the higher the charge-transfer resistance, which is not favorable for charge transfer. Apparently, the smaller arc diameter of the SO-IS-2 composite relative to the pure SnO 2 and In 3– x S 4 samples proves that the charge-transfer resistance is reduced after compositing. The photoelectric and photoelectrochemical results corroborate that the charge separation and transfer in the SnO 2 /In 3– x S 4 composite photocatalysts are greatly improved, thus exhibiting more excellent photocatalytic performance.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%