2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of α-alumina-supported mesoporous bentonite membranes for reverse osmosis desalination of aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For homogenization, the prepared slurry was stirred continuously for 2 h at 750 rpm followed by sonication for 15 min. A slip casting coating technique was employed and the duration of coating was 90 s. After coating, the membranes were dried at 50 °C and 50% relative humidity and finally sintered at 500 °C …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For homogenization, the prepared slurry was stirred continuously for 2 h at 750 rpm followed by sonication for 15 min. A slip casting coating technique was employed and the duration of coating was 90 s. After coating, the membranes were dried at 50 °C and 50% relative humidity and finally sintered at 500 °C …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For homogenization, the prepared slurry was stirred continuously for 2 h at 750 rpm followed by sonication for 15 min. A slip casting coating technique was employed and the duration of coating was 90 s. After coating, the membranes were dried at 50 ∘ C and 50% relative humidity and finally sintered at 500 ∘ C. 20 The prepared membranes were characterized in terms of the clean water permeability measured in an inhouse designed tangential filtration pilot. Porosity and pore size distribution were determined by BET method [Quantachrome Poremaster, USA].…”
Section: Membrane Preparation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydraulic conductivity values used in the modelling were in the range of k = 2.4×10 −10 -1.7×10 −6 m s −1 (Zimmermann et al, 2007;Zhou et al, 2005;White and Deen, 2002;Li et al, 2004) and these were chosen to span the likely range for calcium alginate microspheres. Some values out of this range were also considered to investigate their possible effect.…”
Section: Permeability or Hydraulic Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the double layer decreases as the ion concentration increases [11]. In solutions of low ion concentrations, the charged double layers can overlap in the nano-scale intercrystalline space, which effectively limits the entry and motion of charged ions [12,13]. Therefore, for high quality zeolite membranes, the ion permeation through a very small number of intercrystal pores may be negligible during RO of dilute solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%