1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(96)00909-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of yeast cells for surface analysis by XPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…XPS analysis of mercury-laden/unladen cells was performed according to the method described before [1718]. Yeast cell samples were washed with ddH 2 O, frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-drying at 268 K, mounted the obtained powder in a trough and then pressed before being transferred to the analysis chamber of the spectrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XPS analysis of mercury-laden/unladen cells was performed according to the method described before [1718]. Yeast cell samples were washed with ddH 2 O, frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-drying at 268 K, mounted the obtained powder in a trough and then pressed before being transferred to the analysis chamber of the spectrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature of the freeze-dryer shelf was maintained at Ϫ50°C for 3 h; then it was increased to Ϫ5°C over 15 h and maintained at Ϫ5°C for 6 to 12 h; finally, it was increased to 23°C over 3 h. The dehydrated cell powder was homogenized with a spatula and pressed with a polyacetal cylinder cleaned with isopropanol. More details of the procedure can be found in a previous paper (10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3 -5] The procedure was evaluated and optimized using brewing yeast cells. [6,7] The relevance and interest of XPS data with respect to the real cell surface is supported by relationships with the nature and physiological state of the microorganisms, as well as by correlations with surface electrical properties and hydrophobicity, and microbial cell behavior at interfaces. [4,8] However, rearrangements of the macromolecular network at the surface, resulting from freezing or water removal, cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[4,8] However, rearrangements of the macromolecular network at the surface, resulting from freezing or water removal, cannot be excluded. [7] Low temperature XPS (LTXPS) was extensively used to reduce degradation. XPS spectra of lyophilized histidine recorded at low temperature showed a degree of protonation in agreement with expectation from solution, but the spectra recorded at room temperature revealed a deprotonation due to the loss of HCl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%