1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb04065.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of vascular endothelium for scanning electron microscopy: a comparison of the effects of perfusion and immersion fixation

Abstract: A comparison of currently used methods of tissue fixation for scanning electron microscopic study of vascular endothelium revealed that in situ fixation by intravascular perfusion is superior to immersion for the preservation of endothelial surface morphology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology of the endothelium of the sphereplugged vessels supports the hypothesis that the intravascular pressures are lower on the downstream side of the microspheres. The wrinkled surfaces and irregular cell margins we observed in the smaller vascular diameter side of the spheres are similar to those seen in arterial endothelial cells fixed at low intravascular pressures or by immersion fixation (Gertz et al, 1975;Clark & Glagov, 1976;Swinehart et al, 1976;Reidy & Schwartz, 1981;Garbarsch eta]., 1982). In contrast, the smooth appearance of the endothelial surfaces on the larger vascular diameter side of the microspheres is similar to that observed with endothelium fixed with elevated intravascular pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The morphology of the endothelium of the sphereplugged vessels supports the hypothesis that the intravascular pressures are lower on the downstream side of the microspheres. The wrinkled surfaces and irregular cell margins we observed in the smaller vascular diameter side of the spheres are similar to those seen in arterial endothelial cells fixed at low intravascular pressures or by immersion fixation (Gertz et al, 1975;Clark & Glagov, 1976;Swinehart et al, 1976;Reidy & Schwartz, 1981;Garbarsch eta]., 1982). In contrast, the smooth appearance of the endothelial surfaces on the larger vascular diameter side of the microspheres is similar to that observed with endothelium fixed with elevated intravascular pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…All carotid arteries were fixed in situ by intracardiac perfusion of 1.6% glutaraldehyde in 0.08 M Sorensen's sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 310 mosmol/liter, 120 mmHg, room temperature) without prior exsanguination (14). Arterial segments were excised from the sites of, and distal to, the application of CaCl2 (RCCA) and from similar segments ofcontrol vessels (LCCA) to which NaCI was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both common carotid arteries, the LAD, and the circumflex coronary arteries were then excised, immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for at least 24 hours, and processed for SEM studies by the critical point drying technique. 4 The arteries were then opened longitudinally into three or four parts, mounted on aluminum studs, coated with gold palladium, and examined with a Cambridge S-180 scanning electron microscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%