2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of Tris-Heteroleptic Iridium(III) Complexes Containing a Cyclometalated Aryl-N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligand

Abstract: A new class of phosphorescent tris-heteroleptic iridium(III) complexes has been discovered. The addition of PhMeImAgI (PhMeIm = 1-phenyl-3-methylimidazolylidene) to the dimer [Ir(μ-Cl)(COD)] (1; COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) affords IrCl(COD)(PhMeIm) (2), which reacts with 1-phenylisoquinoline, 2-phenylpyridine, and 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridine to give the respective dimers [Ir(μ-Cl){κ- C, C-(CH-ImMe)}{κ- C, N-(CH-isoqui)}] (3), [Ir(μ-Cl){κ- C, C-(CH-ImMe)}{κ- C, N-(CH-py)}] (4), and [Ir(μ-Cl){κ- C, C-(CH-ImMe)}… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[42,43] We anticipated that the donor properties of the triazolylidene moiety would benefit the emission efficiencies of cyclometalatedP t IV complexes by increasing the energy of deactivating excited states of LMCT character to ag reater extent than in the case of 2-arylpyridines. Cyclometalating aryl-NHC ligands have previously been employed for the synthesis of luminescentc omplexes of Ir III , [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Pt II , [53][54][55][56] and Au III [57] with enhanced emission properties, often as non-chromophorics upporting ligands. However, most of them are normal 2-imidazolylidene-typea ryl-NHCs, whereas mesoionic aryl-NHCs have only been employed to prepare a limited number of luminescent Pt II complexeso ft he type [Pt(C^C*)(O^O)] (O^O = b-diketonate).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42,43] We anticipated that the donor properties of the triazolylidene moiety would benefit the emission efficiencies of cyclometalatedP t IV complexes by increasing the energy of deactivating excited states of LMCT character to ag reater extent than in the case of 2-arylpyridines. Cyclometalating aryl-NHC ligands have previously been employed for the synthesis of luminescentc omplexes of Ir III , [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Pt II , [53][54][55][56] and Au III [57] with enhanced emission properties, often as non-chromophorics upporting ligands. However, most of them are normal 2-imidazolylidene-typea ryl-NHCs, whereas mesoionic aryl-NHCs have only been employed to prepare a limited number of luminescent Pt II complexeso ft he type [Pt(C^C*)(O^O)] (O^O = b-diketonate).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, different from the one set of proton signals (Figure S2, Supporting Information) of the ( acac ) − in the C 2 ‐symmetric [Ir(C^N 1 ) 2 (O^O)]/[Ir(C^N 2 ) 2 (O^O)], the H atoms on the two ‐CH 3 groups in every ( acac ) − ancillary ligand were split into two sets of singlet signals, peaking at 1.86 and 1.76 ppm for 1 , 1.74 and 1.68 ppm for 2 or 1.73 and 1.61 ppm for 3 , respectively, indicating the desirable destruction of structural symmetry. [ 15–19 ] The C 1 ‐symmetric [Ir(C^N 1 )(C^N 2 )(O^O)]‐ tris ‐heteroleptic character of the representative Ir(III)‐complex 2 was further confirmed by its X‐ray crystallographic analysis (Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information). As depicted in Figure , one ( iqbt ) − ligand, one ( ppy ) − ligand with the similar C^N chelation (C11^N1 or C18^N2) mode and one ( acac ) − ancillary ligand with the O^O‐chelate (O1^O2) mode coordinate to one Ir(III)‐center in a distorted octahedral geometry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[ 14 ] In light of the transformation [ 15 ] of the 1 T nature in the C 1 ‐symmetric tris ‐heteroleptic Ir(III)‐complex composed of an Ir(III) ion and three different ligands, it is of notable interest on expanding that novel molecule‐engineered strategy to Ir(III)‐complex‐based NIR‐emitters, which should fill in the blank after previously reported NIR‐emissive [Ir(C^N) 3 ]‐ [ 8 ] and [Ir(C^N) 2 (L^X)]‐heteroleptic [ 9–11 ] Ir(III)‐complexes. Indeed, for C 1 ‐symmetric tris ‐heteroleptic Ir(III)‐complexes, their evident advantage lies in the potentially enriched inventory ([Ir(C^N 1 )(C^N 2 )(L^X)] (L^X = O^O or N^N), [ 15,16 ] [Ir(C^N 1 )(C^N 2 )(C^N 3 )], [ 17 ] [Ir(C^N 1 )(C^C 2 )(C^N 3 )], [ 18 ] [Ir(C^N 1 )(N^N 1 )(N^N 2 )], [ 19 ] etc.) compared to conventional [Ir(C^N) 3 ]‐ [ 8 ] and [Ir(C^N) 2 (L^X)]‐counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chemical structures of the tris ‐heteroleptic complexes are depicted in Scheme . Esteruelas and co‐workers reported on a series of tris ‐heteroleptic compounds of general formula [Ir(C ^ N)(C ^ C)(O ^ O)], where O ^ O is an acac ligand . The procedure used a stepwise metalation of the 1‐phenyl‐3‐methylimidazolylidene onto the [Ir(µ‐Cl)(1,5‐cyclooctadiene)] 2 via silver‐NHC transfer agent, followed by a double cyclometalation via ortho ‐C–H activation under mild conditions in presence of the C ^ N ligand to afford the corresponding mixed chloro‐dimer.…”
Section: Neutral Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%