1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-9834(00)83256-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of supported copper catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integration of the combined peak area suggests complete reduction, although the intensity ratio for the two peaks is not even, suggesting that the sample resides in a mixture of Cu + and Cu 2+ states following calcination. Indeed, the relative proportion of Cu + and Cu 2+ as well as the temperature at which these reduction stages take place has previously been shown to depend on both Cu dispersion and calcination temperature [53]. The TPR profile does not suggest the formation of a copper aluminate phase to any significant extend which is consistent with previous reports which highlight that calcination temperatures in excess of 873 K are necessary to form such a phase [26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Integration of the combined peak area suggests complete reduction, although the intensity ratio for the two peaks is not even, suggesting that the sample resides in a mixture of Cu + and Cu 2+ states following calcination. Indeed, the relative proportion of Cu + and Cu 2+ as well as the temperature at which these reduction stages take place has previously been shown to depend on both Cu dispersion and calcination temperature [53]. The TPR profile does not suggest the formation of a copper aluminate phase to any significant extend which is consistent with previous reports which highlight that calcination temperatures in excess of 873 K are necessary to form such a phase [26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The TPR results indicate the presence of only one active phase, recognized as CuO-like species [12,13]. For catalysts with copper contents over 4 wt% Cu per 100 m 2 /g of alumina, segregation of CuO phase occurs due to saturation of adsorption sites with Cu +2 ions [14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.5 wt% for the c-alumina used in our work). Thus, other phases, such as surface spinel, could be detected by TPR [13,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials). However, different species of Cu 2+ and Cu + may be also reduced in this temperature range [23,25].…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Reduction By Hydrogen (H 2 -Tpr)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, coper aluminate species (CuAl 2 O 4 ) may be formed if traces of extra-framework aluminum (EFAL) remains in the zeolite samples, due for instance to dealumination caused by hydrothermal treatments. CuAl 2 O 4 reduction by H 2 should then occurs around 500 • C [23]. Besides, it was reported that the reduction temperature of exchanged copper species are depending on the zeolite Si/Al ratio, with a decrease in the reduction peak temperature with the increase of the Si/Al ratio [24].…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Reduction By Hydrogen (H 2 -Tpr)mentioning
confidence: 97%