1974
DOI: 10.1021/ac60337a044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of sulfur dioxide for mass spectrometer analyses by combustion of sulfides with copper oxide

Abstract: The mass-spectrometric determination of 34S/32S ratios in natural materials is most commonly done with sulfur dioxide. The standard technique for the preparation of sulfur dioxide from sulfides or native sulfur consists of their combustion in a stream of oxygen at temperatures between 900 and 1350 °C (1-3). This technique allows the almost total recovery of the sulfur in the form of sulfur dioxide and, therefore, has been accepted by most laboratories. However, this conversion is not carried out under vacuum, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drill was cleaned between each sample extraction to ensure no crosssample contamination. Hand-picked or drilled mineral separates were combusted with excess CuO in vacuo to produce SO 2 by the method of Fritz et al (1974). Sulfur-isotope analyses were performed in the Central Science Laboratory at the University of Tasmania on a VG ISOGAS stable isotope mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drill was cleaned between each sample extraction to ensure no crosssample contamination. Hand-picked or drilled mineral separates were combusted with excess CuO in vacuo to produce SO 2 by the method of Fritz et al (1974). Sulfur-isotope analyses were performed in the Central Science Laboratory at the University of Tasmania on a VG ISOGAS stable isotope mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robinson and Kusakabe (1975) used Cu2O for direct oxidation of sulphide minerals to SO,. They noted, as did Fritz et al (1974) using CuO, that difficulties were experienced burning certain minerals, e.g., ZnS, PbS. This does not appear to be the case for the current technique, although the yields seem slightly lower for pyrite and pyrrhotite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Direct combustion of Ag2S and other sulphide minerals to SO2 has been carried out using 02 (e.g., Thode et al, 1961), 02-N2 mixtures (e.g., Sakai and Yamamoto, 1966), and solid oxidants such as PbO (Vinogradov et al, 1956), V205 (Gavelin et al, 1960;Ricke, 1964), CuO (Grinenko, 1962;Fritz et al, 1974) or Cu2O (Robinson and Kusakabe, 1975). In these combustions, the yields of SO, were often below 95% and proper corrections were not always made for oxygen isotope variations in the SO2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen and hydrogen were released from milky, clear and smoky quartz using the BrF 5 extraction technique of Clayton and Mayeda (1963) and Friedman and O'Neil (1977), whereas carbon and oxygen in calcite by using the CO 2 treating of Clayton et al (1972). Sulfur was released as SO 2 after the method of Fritz et al (1974). The isotopic ratios are reported in standard δ notation per mil relative to SMOW for oxygen and hydrogen, Pee Dee belemnite for carbon, and Cañon Diablo troilite for sulfur.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%