1990
DOI: 10.1080/00021369.1990.10870189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of Streochemically Pure Sex Pheromone Components of the Pine Sawfly (Neodiprion sertifer) and Field Tests of the Synthetic Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a true synergism between the SSS-and other isomers was found only at the Siberian site (2), where addition of either the SRS-or the SRRisomer was necessary to catch significant numbers of N. sertifer males. Previous studies had reported considerable synergism in both Japan and North America, with catches increasing 5-8 times (Kikukawa et al, 1983;Tai et al, 1990). However, in the current study we did not find any combination of isomers to be significantly better than the pure SSS-isomer at these sites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, a true synergism between the SSS-and other isomers was found only at the Siberian site (2), where addition of either the SRS-or the SRRisomer was necessary to catch significant numbers of N. sertifer males. Previous studies had reported considerable synergism in both Japan and North America, with catches increasing 5-8 times (Kikukawa et al, 1983;Tai et al, 1990). However, in the current study we did not find any combination of isomers to be significantly better than the pure SSS-isomer at these sites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…(To improve readability, the numbers of the stereogenic carbons have been omitted from here on; thus the (2S,3S,7S)-isomer is abbreviated as SSS-isomer.) Both isomers have also been tested in Japan, where it was found that the SRR-isomer increased the catches even at high doses (Tai et al, 1990). Field tests in Europe, however, showed that the SRR-isomer was antagonistic even when added in amounts below 1% in relation to the SSS-isomer (Anderbrant et al, 1992a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synergistic effect observed by Olaifa et al (1987), when the differently baited traps were rotated among positions, was not statistically significant. Like-wise, the results from Japan (Tai et al, 1990), indicating synergism of SRR over a large range of ratios, but only weak inhibitory effect, may partly be due to low captures and positional effects, and no statistical test was presented. When adding 2-20 ~o SRR-isomer to the SSS-isomer, Tai et al (1990) still caught as many sawflies as they did with SSS alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like-wise, the results from Japan (Tai et al, 1990), indicating synergism of SRR over a large range of ratios, but only weak inhibitory effect, may partly be due to low captures and positional effects, and no statistical test was presented. When adding 2-20 ~o SRR-isomer to the SSS-isomer, Tai et al (1990) still caught as many sawflies as they did with SSS alone. However, large trap catches may be obtained with incorrect bait or even with no bait at all if the trap is too unspecific (Anderbrant et al, 1989, in litt.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sertifer reacts differently to the (2S,3 R,7R)-isomer depending on where in the distribution range the test is conducted (ANDERBRANT, 1993). In Japan, for example, the effect of the (2S,3R,7R)-isomer seems to be mainly synergistic (TAI et al, 1990), whereas in Europe the addition of only 1 % to the attractive (2S,3S,7S)-isomer can reduce the catch completely (ANDERBRANT et al, 1992a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%