1979
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(79)90112-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of slime sheath from Dictyostelium discoideum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slugs of D. discoideum strain WS380B [25] were prepared as previously described [28] and allowed to migrate across the petri plate towards a point light source [29] for 4–5 days. By this time all the slugs had completely traversed the plate, leaving it covered with a layer of sheath essentially free of cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slugs of D. discoideum strain WS380B [25] were prepared as previously described [28] and allowed to migrate across the petri plate towards a point light source [29] for 4–5 days. By this time all the slugs had completely traversed the plate, leaving it covered with a layer of sheath essentially free of cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard conditions were used for the growth of D. discoideum amoebae and the preparation of migrating slugs (18,19). Sheath, sheath extracts, and slug cell extracts were prepared as previously described (3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous roles for the sheath have been suggested, evaluation of these proposals has been hampered by the lack of information concerning the composition of the sheath. It contains cellulose fibrils (1) in a highly proteinaceous matrix (5,18), and recent work with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has demonstrated shared antigenic determinants on a large number of prespore cell surface and extracellular matrix proteins (3; Grant et al, manuscript in preparation). Furthermore, there are a small number of specific cell surface proteins which are also apparently in the sheath, i.e., have cellular and extracellular forms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low pH of the substrate surface is unlikely to affect the pH within the cells as Kay et al (1986) have shown. One possibility is that there are proteases in the slime sheath among the many different proteins Smith & Williams (1979) found there, and lowering the pH at the contact surface might be more favourable for inducing their proteolytic activity. Furthermore, it is known that slime moulds secrete proteases in large quantities and they are acid proteases, with highest activity at low pH values (North & Harwood, 1979;North, 1982).…”
Section: Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%